Sarah Palin Readies Bus Tour Amid 2012 Speculation
- Thread starter Cerise
- Start date
Winky
Well-Known Member
catocom
Well-Known Member
no, teaching them to be 'charitable on their own' is fine.
Teaching them that 'they have to share' mandatory is wrong.
Winky
Well-Known Member
will the kids really go along with this?
Ah c'mon cato it goes far beyond that
I'm continually amazed how many of these
commie pinko fag concepts have seeped into
my Son's mind from his having been immersed
in the ill-liberal cesspool of a college campus
over the last six years
One thing gives me hope
none of the college kids think they should be
taxed 88% of their income to support this silliness
Ah c'mon cato it goes far beyond that
I'm continually amazed how many of these
commie pinko fag concepts have seeped into
my Son's mind from his having been immersed
in the ill-liberal cesspool of a college campus
over the last six years
One thing gives me hope
none of the college kids think they should be
taxed 88% of their income to support this silliness
catocom
Well-Known Member
Re: Sarah Palin is so 2008
in general, but to really be accurate, one has to break it down on a case by case basis.
Take pot for instance....
IMO it should be a state issue.....Let CA try it, and or Vermont.
Mark the result...
Liberalism in the fed definitely does not work.
in general, but to really be accurate, one has to break it down on a case by case basis.
Take pot for instance....
IMO it should be a state issue.....Let CA try it, and or Vermont.
Mark the result...
Liberalism in the fed definitely does not work.
spike
New Member
You dropped it because using your own logic against you left you nowhere to go except to throw a temper tantrum like a child and scream "idiot! hurrr durrr" in you impotent rage.
You still have no answer if a bad economy and rising oil prices are controlled by the president and mean they are unsuccessful as you said -> both these things happened under Bush -> Bush was an unsuccessful president.
Here's Bush's record on the stock market:
"He[Bush] has presided over the evisceration of more than $4.6 trillion of U.S. stock market wealth as measured by the S&P 500."
"By comparison, the S&P 500 gained more than $9 trillion in value under the eight years of Bill Clinton’s administration."
And for good measure here's Obama vs. Bush.
On GDP:
"There’s no such thing as a free lunch, and there’s no such thing as an honest case for extending the Bush tax cuts. Ten years of hard data prove that in terms of promoting economic growth and creating jobs, they have been a miserable failure. They didn’t work while George W. Bush was in office and they haven’t worked during the first two years of the Obama Administration. No wonder the Congressional Budget Office says that the GOP’s proposed extension of tax cuts to the rich will reduce future economic growth.
In terms of promoting economic growth, the Bush tax cuts have been a miserable failure.
Under George W. Bush, U.S. GDP growth averaged 2.1 percent a year. Since the end of World War II, the country has never experienced such low economic growth during an eight-year period. And if you exclude the war demobilization of 1946, when U.S. government spending fell by two-thirds and GDP fell by 10.9 percent, Bush had the worst economic record since Herbert Hoover.
There’s simply no way to make Bush’s performance look good. Even if you cherry-pick the data (by excluding fiscal year 2008, when GDP growth was zero), economic expansion was anemic. During Bush’s first seven years, it averaged 2.4 percent, the worst rate in half a century. And what was the source of most of that economic growth? Homeowner equity extraction. Meanwhile, one sector where growth outpaced that of all prior administrations was residential mortgage debt. It almost doubled between 2001 and 2006, from $5.1 to $9.8 trillion."
http://failuremag.com/index.php/failure_analysis/article/the_bush_tax_cuts/#ixzz1OtePNn1B
http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/11/22/bush-tax-cuts-and-economic-growth/
Here's jobs under Bush:
"President George W. Bush will leave office Tuesday with the worst employment-growth record of any president since World War II, according to a new analysis by Bizjournals.
The nation’s job base grew at an annual rate of 0.28 percent during Bush’s eight years as president – by far the slowest pace for any of the 11 presidents in the postwar era, according to Bizjournals. Bizjournals is the online media arm of American City Business Journals, The Business Review's parent company.
The previous low had been set by Bush’s father, George H.W. Bush, with an annual job-growth rate of 0.59 percent. The elder Bush served between 1989 and 1993."
http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonville/stories/2009/01/19/daily7.html
"Jobs are growing in the U.S. They've grown for 12 straight months under Obama's economic stimulus policies and, in 2010 alone, more jobs were added than in Bush's 8 years as president."
http://ecopolitology.org/2011/01/12/obama-created-more-jobs-in-2010-than-bush-did-in-8-years/
So you're saying he couldn't get it done under a fully Republican Congress and only made progress when Democrats controlled the House and there was a split Senate?
Yeah, that trajectory didn't change much.
Actually they had completely different policies. Bush had a policy of not finding him:
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." - Bush
"I don't know where he is. I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him." - Bush
"Deep in my heart I know the man's on the run, if he's alive at all...I just don't spend much time on it, really, to be honest with you." - Bush
and then disbanded the CIA unit dedicated to finding bin Laden.
Obama had a policy of finding him.
bin Laden “has to be our biggest national security priority.” - Obama
What did the previous two elections make clear to you?
Wait for 2012. You're going to get TeaBagged again.
CNN Poll: Unfavorable view of tea party on the rise
Right, conservatives just want the government to take away freedoms.
No private property rights there
2minkey
bootlicker
yeah that sounds a little progressive for you traditionalists.