another post about gay marriages... but this one might make you go "hmmmm"...

Gonz

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
The slippery slope argument.

In 1960 homosexuality was a mental disorder.
In 1970 homo's were coning out of the closet & they were proud.
In 1980 homosexulaity was the leading distributor of HIV & it was Reagans fault.
In 1990 homosexuality became a leading TV theme.
In 2000 they wish to be married.
In 2004 polygamists use the homosexuals argument for legalizing marraige between multiples. NAMBLA is actively pursuing the psyche people to change the definition of pedophilia.

Nope, ain't no slope there.
 
MrBishop

MrBishop

Well-Known Member
Gonz said:
The slippery slope argument.

In 1960 homosexuality was a mental disorder.
In 1970 homo's were coning out of the closet & they were proud.
In 1980 homosexulaity was the leading distributor of HIV & it was Reagans fault.
In 1990 homosexuality became a leading TV theme.
In 2000 they wish to be married.
In 2004 polygamists use the homosexuals argument for legalizing marraige between multiples. NAMBLA is actively pursuing the psyche people to change the definition of pedophilia.

Nope, ain't no slope there.
Click to expand...

Again a jump from homosexuality to paedophilia? That slope is getting tiresome. Oh well, at least you didn't end your slope with beastiality. :D

1969...cops were performing raids on bathhouses and the popluace was cheering them on.
2004...sodomy is not considered illegal in most states, although bathhouses and sex-clubs are harrased equally. Gay clubs are not raided.
2020...no more gay-clubs or gay-villages because homosexuals no longer need to segregate themselves for their own safety. Gay-pride parades stopped 5 years ago, and the gay-olympics are no longer necessary.
2025...NAMBA fails yet again to convince the GVT to lower age of consent
 
Gonz

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
NAMBLA doesn't want age of consent lowered, they want man/boy love legalized. That is not the issue.

The issue is that as we move left each taboo gets dropped & society takes a nosedive. It all works to form a big picture. You're looking at the little piece of the puzzle. It looks alright until you see what it makes.
 
Thulsa Doom

Thulsa Doom

New Member
The problem with the logic of this old argument is that at the top of the continuum is same race heterosexual marriage. So one could easily argue that allowing ANY marriage leads to abuse of the system. It’s a self defeating view based on being able to draw an invisible arbitrary line somewhere on the continuum and say here is where the problem starts. You know what, if you never allowed any one to get married you wouldn’t have 70 year old bisexual grandmothers marrying their gold fish. Problem solved!
 
Gonz

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Arbitrary lines...

18 is age of adulthood. Why? Why not 17 or 21? An arbitrary line needed to be drawn somewhere.

21 is the age one is legally allowed to consume alchol. Why? Why not 18, the age of ascent or 24 or 35? An arbitrary line needed to be drawn somewhere.

Children begin school around age 6. Depending on the state. Why not 10 or 3? An arbitrary line needed to be drawn somewhere.

We live in an ordered civilized world. Lines must be drawn somewhere. If someone can be shown to be hurt by a line it may be changed given certain circumstances. If the only complaint is I can't do it too then move on, we've more important matters. Racial marriage borders created an artificial line that caused harm (the children of such relationships were bastards). The same cannot be said of homosexuals.
 
Winky

Winky

Well-Known Member
Yippee yahoo for the shit fuckers!

bring on the
1ymjk3.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top