Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolution

[randomJACKASS]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

We have a saying:

When one talks to God, we call it religion.
When he speaks back we call it schizophrenia.​

Such a spiritual infant! Better luck next life!

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

so what do you make of thinking to one's self?

I love me sum Louie and I enjoy discovering wondrous things as well as daily self-reflection, but your question/point is a little open.

My little phrase is a professional guideline for consideration that follows Ockham's razor .

 

[catocom]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

your question is a little open.

atm I don't know how to ask it any more simply.
(working on it)

I don't know what "Ockham's razor" is fully yet, but am now studying on it.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

atm I don't know how to ask it any more simply.
(working on it)

There is a number of types of thought processing with infinite variables.

• Reasoning
• Bizarre
• Emotional
• etc.

 

[catocom]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

infinite variables?
wow, that's pretty wide open to me.
One could make any kind of determination with that alone.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

infinite variables?
wow, that's pretty wide open to me.
One could make any kind of determination with that alone.

It makes individuals unique, no two ever have been or will be the same.

 

[catocom]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

It makes individuals unique, no two ever have been or will be the same.

imo it doesn't Make anything

 

[catocom]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

I was just studying "Ockham's razor"
Seems it conflicts with the faith in Christianity to me.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

imo it doesn't Make anything

Whatever makes it, no two will ever be the same.

 

[spike]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

No, I do not approve you dunder head, I said its working.

I see, you think the systems is working but you don't like that it is working.

You also seem to have little interest in discussing your healthcare as evolution theory.

 

[catocom]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

Whatever makes it, no two will ever be the same.

I can definitely agree with that.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

I was just studying "Ockham's razor"
Seems it conflicts with the faith in Christianity to me.

A fine example, you are unique in your thought processing. While others may agree, no other person will come to the same conclusion in the exact manner you did. Your phenomenological prose is unique to you alone.

 

[catocom]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

then how can one make a judgement on another one's mental health?

 

[spike]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

Perhaps we should deny healthcare to anyone with any type of mental illness.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

I see, you think the systems is working but you don't like that it is working.

My car is working but I treat it like it like shit and use it as a work truck. I wash it often and keep the rims shiny. I only change the oil when it makes noise. Soon my car will not be working. --Ode to medicare.

You also seem to have little interest in discussing your healthcare as evolution theory.

I wish we could discuss it at length over a reasonable period of time and make good choices that we can agree on. Not have it rammed down our throats to fulfill a socialist agenda.

I think its reasonable to have the final bills posted online for the citizens to see for 30 days, and that ALL representatives are required to read it and study it before any committing vote is made.

30 days is not a long wait for such a enormous change in the American system, we have the right to see it and assess it before it is made into law.




Wouldn't you agree?

 

[catocom]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

Perhaps we should deny healthcare to anyone with any type of mental illness.

I think there are other ways of determination

seems to me that confusion should be address, along with physical problems.
among other things...

edit: I just do believe in that "Ockham's razor"

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

then how can one make a judgement on another one's mental health?

Skill and training. No two cases are the same although they may carry the same qualifiers of diagnosis.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

Perhaps we should deny healthcare to anyone with any type of mental illness.

I think you should deny you oxygen, do you have plastic bags handy?

Most people believe in helping those who have problems, just not forced to fuel a fucked up system to do it.

 

[catocom]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

Skill and training. No two cases are the same although they may carry the same qualifiers of diagnosis.

I can't necessarily disagree with that.
There is a reason why doohickey's razor is just a theory though.
I don't think it should be a guideline.

 

[ResearchMonkey]

Re: Free health care to all clearly goes against natural selection, Darwin, and evolu

I can't necessarily disagree with that.
There is a reason why doohickey's razor is just a theory though.
I don't think it should be a guideline.

I understand what you are saying and why. Sometimes the mentally ill have internal stimuli, audio hallucination, that they interpret as "god", "satan", "jesus" or "Michael Jackson".. When this internal stimuli is commanding that they harm themself or others, medication intervention is the ideal treatment.

As a follow up with this course of action; its not unusual for the individual to grieve and complain that they feel like they have lost their close relationship with their [deity of choice].

Its a fine line to walk.