spike
New Member
Understandable since there was no example of censorship.
Gen. Pace...
- Thread starter Gato_Solo
- Start date
Understandable since there was no example of censorship.
spike
New Member
Look, you're the one that needs to catch up
Already posted them.
Ahhh, by eliminate the bigotry I meant eliminate the practice of not allowing openly gay folks to serve in the military. That has nothing to do with censorship.
...and it's not encouraging anyone to shut up either.
Pay attention.
By the way, "source please" for your claim of Pelosi lowering military standards.
Already posted them.
Ahhh, by eliminate the bigotry I meant eliminate the practice of not allowing openly gay folks to serve in the military. That has nothing to do with censorship.
...and it's not encouraging anyone to shut up either.
Pay attention.
By the way, "source please" for your claim of Pelosi lowering military standards.
spike
New Member
Since they are not able to understand they should not judge. So go ahead and tell me the reason for the discrimination.
By the way, "source please" for your claim of Pelosi lowering military standards.
Please, check your facts.
spike
New Member
well, i must say your style has improved much Spike 
- but i still don't see why you or your protagonists need be quite so confrontational to the degree that any intelligent debate or good honest but well meant flames go out of the window .... ?(
just seems like pointless dogmatism on both sides -
try a mere modicum of respect for each other - perchance you'll get better debate, more fun and even the better flame!
best all, BB
- but i still don't see why you or your protagonists need be quite so confrontational to the degree that any intelligent debate or good honest but well meant flames go out of the window .... ?(just seems like pointless dogmatism on both sides -
try a mere modicum of respect for each other - perchance you'll get better debate, more fun and even the better flame!
best all, BB
We seem to have two different problems here.
First & foremost...provide a source for your material. Something as simple as "from the previous links" would suffice. As an administrator, if I ask, you need to provide or remove. Otherwise, you are in violation of the AUP.
Secondly, you said I said Pelosi did, or did not do, something. I referred to the left in general, in lowering the standards of military conditioning. Since we don't have time to go thru the entire 8 years of Clintons slashing of the military budget nor the history of the US military service, let it suffice that since the 1970s, the physical demands on recruits has been substantially reduced. That is, I'm sure, easily verifiable. I'm using my recollection of a number of stories, and personal experience, regarding this.
First & foremost...provide a source for your material. Something as simple as "from the previous links" would suffice. As an administrator, if I ask, you need to provide or remove. Otherwise, you are in violation of the AUP.
Secondly, you said I said Pelosi did, or did not do, something. I referred to the left in general, in lowering the standards of military conditioning. Since we don't have time to go thru the entire 8 years of Clintons slashing of the military budget nor the history of the US military service, let it suffice that since the 1970s, the physical demands on recruits has been substantially reduced. That is, I'm sure, easily verifiable. I'm using my recollection of a number of stories, and personal experience, regarding this.
spike
New Member
Source provided before you even asked. Just making yourself look silly and incompetent as an administrator when you don't read the info you asked for and can't back up any of your own claims.
spike
New Member
Let's see, that's post 40 but you even quoted my sources in post 34 as if you read them.
You feelin' alright? Maybe you have a fever.
If you are alright maybe you can start answering a few of the many questions you've avoided of mine in this thread. The cop outs are becoming silly looking.
spike
New Member
Posts #'s in front of questions you avoided...
#18 Why would it make someone nervous?
#18 Do you mean the current system makes gays nervous about being found out?
#31 Now you want to expand on what standards Pelosi(or the left) is responsible for lowering ("some stuff has been lowered since 71" really doesn't cut it)
#31 What does Bush's psuedo service has to do with anything?
#40 Who did you prove wrong now? What's this have to do with anything?
Here's another one. You said....
Now explain how it's not hypocrisy for you to want gays serving in the military not to be able to express their beliefs no matter how un-PC they are?
#18 Why would it make someone nervous?
#18 Do you mean the current system makes gays nervous about being found out?
#31 Now you want to expand on what standards Pelosi(or the left) is responsible for lowering ("some stuff has been lowered since 71" really doesn't cut it)
#31 What does Bush's psuedo service has to do with anything?
#40 Who did you prove wrong now? What's this have to do with anything?
Here's another one. You said....
Now explain how it's not hypocrisy for you to want gays serving in the military not to be able to express their beliefs no matter how un-PC they are?
They can express any goddamed thing they wish to express. However, when they know the rules & break them, they should not bitch. There is no rule about espousing homosexuality. There are rules against practicing it.
18-I don't knw. I'm not homosexual
18-It shouldn't.
31-answered
One last time...your beliefs of what bigotry is & what what bigotry really is are not the same. You have approximately half the story.
18-I don't knw. I'm not homosexual
18-It shouldn't.
31-answered
One last time...your beliefs of what bigotry is & what what bigotry really is are not the same. You have approximately half the story.
spike
New Member
Wrong...remember the "Don't tell" part of the rule?
The rules need to be change so as not to encourage government sponsored bigotry. Of course they should bitch.
That's like saying "There's rules against blacks using this washroom if they break the rules they should not bitch".
Then why did you say it? You admit having no point.
You're right. They should be able to express themselves no matter how un-PC.
Where?
I have the full story and you approve of half of it.
And you missed a couple questions yet again.