JTP
New Member
What's your take?
I'm torn between seeing the necessity for it, and knowing that a Chernobyl could very well happen here.
Even with the best crews running a plant, there's always seismic activity, other natural disasters, and terrorism.
Then there is that waste. At least you can see the coal dust and particles. Takes a geiger counter, etc, to detect rads.
People are NOT going to return to a simpler way of life- not en masse, forget it, cousin, so we need energy. Nuclear is set to go, just needs public approval.
What do you all think about it?
I'm torn between seeing the necessity for it, and knowing that a Chernobyl could very well happen here.
Even with the best crews running a plant, there's always seismic activity, other natural disasters, and terrorism.
Then there is that waste. At least you can see the coal dust and particles. Takes a geiger counter, etc, to detect rads.
People are NOT going to return to a simpler way of life- not en masse, forget it, cousin, so we need energy. Nuclear is set to go, just needs public approval.
What do you all think about it?