Town hall meeting

Discussion in 'Town Hall' started by Professur, Oct 13, 2009.

  1. Leslie

    Leslie Communistrator Staff Member

    I think I would pay to see that. :hippy:
     
  2. Cerise

    Cerise Well-Known Member



    The AUP? Can you link it? These are the only rules I could find: :shrug:

     
  3. MrBishop

    MrBishop Well-Known Member

    I generally only hurl because of food poisoning. It's been decades since I last hurled because of booze...I would've called it a memorable experience if I could actually recall all (most, any?) of the details. :D
     
  4. Professur

    Professur Well-Known Member

  5. ResearchMonkey

    ResearchMonkey Well-Known Member

    One needs not to be abusive or rude for liable to occur. There have been dozens of cases where liable has potential for legal recourse, but in reality the chances of the forum being held responsible for the actions of a poster are extremely small. I'm more speaking to profess/poli/actors whom we discuss here. If the forum published it own news page the issue would be relevant.

    The individual posting is 99.999999% responsible for their post. I mean go read perez hiltons responses to his articles.

    Low moderation is healthy and is a difficult position to maintain.
     
  6. Cerise

    Cerise Well-Known Member

  7. Leslie

    Leslie Communistrator Staff Member

  8. ResearchMonkey

    ResearchMonkey Well-Known Member

  9. MrBishop

    MrBishop Well-Known Member

  10. Professur

    Professur Well-Known Member

    I like the old one better.
     
  11. catocom

    catocom Well-Known Member

    that. :hippy:

    .
    .
    there ya go, a free gift :p
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. ResearchMonkey

    ResearchMonkey Well-Known Member

    Now why did you have to go and find this?



    Nazi mods. -- j/k pursuant OTC AUP, Article 5, Section 6.
     
  13. Cerise

    Cerise Well-Known Member

    I have tried using the search with "AUP" entered but with no luck.

    That should be readily available :shrug:

    4.7.2 is interesting as well. "Sexually explicit" Nope. You'd never find any "sexually explicit" or the "mention of private body parts" threads here. :rolleyes:
     
  14. MrBishop

    MrBishop Well-Known Member

    They're talking more about pictures and/or video featuring private body parts etc...
     
  15. ResearchMonkey

    ResearchMonkey Well-Known Member

    EXACTLY -- This AUP can be used to destroy the good and the bad leaving a cardboard hugbox.

    [​IMG]

    The relationship is dependent.
     
  16. Cerise

    Cerise Well-Known Member

    Then this is safe. ;)

    I suppose I wouldn't have to click it once I saw the title........:idea:
     
  17. ResearchMonkey

    ResearchMonkey Well-Known Member

    Would that include Anime? Or photos of a toddler female showing her breast? How about cleavage or a mankini?

    [​IMG]



    Seems subjective and head aches could ensue. -- just sayin'. there have been many AUP hairs split in the past.

    I think moderation should always fall on the least restrictive position, but when moderation falls it falls.

    Weaselly whining infinitum should have little to do with it.
     
  18. paul_valaru

    paul_valaru 100% Pure Canadian Beef

    what is great is that it is not a democracy here, it's a dictatorship, what they say goes. That will end any splitting hair problems.
     
  19. randomJACKASS

    randomJACKASS Banned

  20. ResearchMonkey

    ResearchMonkey Well-Known Member

    Interesting perspective.
     

Share This Page