I generally only hurl because of food poisoning. It's been decades since I last hurled because of booze...I would've called it a memorable experience if I could actually recall all (most, any?) of the details.
One needs not to be abusive or rude for liable to occur. There have been dozens of cases where liable has potential for legal recourse, but in reality the chances of the forum being held responsible for the actions of a poster are extremely small. I'm more speaking to profess/poli/actors whom we discuss here. If the forum published it own news page the issue would be relevant. The individual posting is 99.999999% responsible for their post. I mean go read perez hiltons responses to his articles. Low moderation is healthy and is a difficult position to maintain.
AUPhttp://www.otcentral.com/forum/misc.php?do=page&template=aup Please take special note of 5.7 Thank you for your interest.
http://www.otcentral.com/forum/misc.php?do=page&template=aup Try this one...it used to be listed in the Quick Links, but no more...not sure why.
I have tried using the search with "AUP" entered but with no luck. That should be readily available 4.7.2 is interesting as well. "Sexually explicit" Nope. You'd never find any "sexually explicit" or the "mention of private body parts" threads here.
EXACTLY -- This AUP can be used to destroy the good and the bad leaving a cardboard hugbox. The relationship is dependent.
Would that include Anime? Or photos of a toddler female showing her breast? How about cleavage or a mankini? Seems subjective and head aches could ensue. -- just sayin'. there have been many AUP hairs split in the past. I think moderation should always fall on the least restrictive position, but when moderation falls it falls. Weaselly whining infinitum should have little to do with it.
what is great is that it is not a democracy here, it's a dictatorship, what they say goes. That will end any splitting hair problems.
