Search results

any reason?

i think that enough has changed in society over the last 3000 years to mean marriage can come up to the times. it's hardly that marriage has remained untouched for all that time either, there were long periods where it was by no means an equal partnership, for example.

be glad you live in the us. jif is bathroom cleaner here, and while lemon fresh could be nice on wheat bread i hear the mountain pine taste takes ages to leave the mouth.

my boyjuice has never been chunky. if it was i think i'd be straight to the doctors. :eek: then again, i suppose the poll might not be about sex... :D

it is programmable with php...? :D

yesterday i went swimming at 8.30am, then to finnish class, then home to watch some rugby. then to the health suite in the local leisure centre. sauna, steam room, jacuzzi, sauna, sauna, sauna. home. out to dinner with some friends. home. sleep. today i went swimming at 8.30am. quick...

in the uk there are a few individuals who are heads of companies and also members and contributors to the major political parties. but i suppose the difference is that uk politics is party based during election time, not individual based. the press takes the parties to the cleaners on...

i was always under the impression they still have a healthy missionary (ie conversion) activity to areas they bring aid. i must admit i am surprised in the astonishing amounts of money given by large corporations to the us elections efforts in what must only be seen as an attempt to buy...

when the state became involved in marriage and created the concept of civil unions, with the attributed tax, insurance, health care (et al) priviledges, it was only a matter of time until homosexual relationships would wish to recieve the same extensions. religion is nothing to do with it...

have you ever tried whipping yourself after tying yourself up? tricky business... :nuts2:

that reminds me, it's been about a year since i left wales.... ;) :D

being an admin wouldn't that mean sam is giving himself some serious self-abuse? :D

you can dictate me anytime adminbosslesliesir :D

the hutton enquiry is a whole different business, and there was a great deal about his conclusions that appear to be conflicting (gilligan's testimony was flawed and incorrect, nearly identical testimony from another bbc journo who interviewed kelly was reliable and trustworthy). a great number...

i think if the nytimes had been told by the bbc to remove the quote from their own press or site then perhaps the bbc could be accused of censorship. if the nytimes want to make that quote public then they have the press and their own website at their disposal, and nobody is preventing them.

very much so, it's refreshing to find the hooligan element whose banners and chants are gramatically correct. oscar wilde would have been proud :D

indeed, it's important to keep proper form or i and my homies will bust the proverbial cap into your arse. i certainly wouldn't recommend coming into the west side after nightfall, lest you wish to return in an ambulance. :nuts2:

sir yo' mamma's a toss-soaked fuck-rag on teh arse of societty. your obediant servant brigadier arthur lloyd (Mrs)

the presumption is that it is the same piece, without seeing more than page 1 of the earlier one it is not possible to say what was changed entirely. for all we know the timestamp may have been accidentally left unchanged when revised. the removal of the nytimes para is hardly censorship...

timestamp just declared 'last updated' when i go to the same story as it is today it is now reading as revised this afternoon, at 4.18pm. most of the circled stuff is on the second paragraph, it just appears to have been edited. it barely changes the direction of the piece, merely omits a...