Search results

I have no hands-on opinion on it yet as I've never seen it or used it. If it is any good to you, from slashdot to wired, the general consensus seems to be that it is a good product, way faster and less bloated than Vista. IMO, I'll have to see it to believe it, I'm still afraid people are...

I'd rather have Whisky but I the soup of the day is still a good choice :D

At least the vaccines recalled have less potency and not MORE, just a thought.

The other posts seemed a bit off but not worthy of a ban, this one..... I'm still :confuse3:

Is probably just a bear...

:hbd: (*wishes he was around)

:grumpy:

Been having slow access as well but no 500 nor 404s

that's why he hanged his hat in Tennessee...

Widescreen is great for TVs but I dislike it on monitors. Sooner or later I'll have to use one permanently, since 4:3 is on the way out.

After reading that, I come to the conclusion that a raw file is actually a file that contains raw image data (or data of an image without processing) but not a raw file. I hate it when the marketing people give names to technologies :shrug:

:confuse3: I know this will confuse some people, but the whole point of a RAW file is that it has no format, therefore there's no info within the file that can help to process the file contents properly (like bit depth, resolution, byte ordering, etc). That type of RAW file sounds more to me...

One question, how many files do you get per picture when saving in raw format?

:confuse3:

Good find, I like the way they would look from the earth, I just don't like the way the earth would look.

Even if you were to accept the plausibility of the plot, there are way too many mistakes in the filming (spoilers ahead highlight to read) - When there's the huge eruption breaking mountains and fields the nearby airport experiences no earthquakes whatsoever, in reality earthquakes are felt...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=518XP8prwZo I can't think of anything to say, I'm just :eek2:

Cheers :toast:

:eek: