Search results

I do the research and I make a decision. You asked if I could provide you the cites and sites and I did. If all of my assertions are "tribal scripture", to use your words; why was I a hydrogen proponent before I did some independent research and found that the flaws severely outnumber the...

That is for you to decide based upon your own independent research. You asked for cites and sites and I provided them; yet you are still not happy. You are apparently confusing Gunther and Gunderson. You and Biden. Gunther merely cites the same study that Gunderson did. Pun intended...

Can't. I'm 86'd because last time I thought I was supposed to throw him.

The introduction wasn't pretty. Those who have electrics are now on foot or dependent on those who drive petro-cars. SOURCE

Yes, and Barack Obama is the first half-Black president.

HAR!

Well, there ya go!

Yes. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory is here: http://www.nrel.gov/ The quoted article wherein the statement "the reduction in power from shading half of one cell is equivalent to removing a cell active area 36 times the shadow's actual size." is contained is here...

For those who are screaming at their computer right now, simply read on and find out why this is true. It seems that shadowing from any source is multiplied exponentially over the array. That shadow can be as brazen as full shadow or as subtle as a fine coat of dust. SOURCE

Sorry if you were offended by my politically correct responses.

Has anyone considered the feelings of those poor dogs in this case?

Mah chow is daid! Git me mah liar on the phone! I'll sue!

Wow, he mixed up Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Bet no one has done that before. After all, they sound so much alike and are almost spelled the same. :rolleyes:

Still One More Time! SOURCE

Of all of the terrorist events, including the nineteen listed on the chart, none of those events has been stopped by TSA. I guess you need the long version for everything. Proving the negative one negative at a time.

Here's your fuckin' negative. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2010/11/does_the_tsa_ever_catch_terrorists.html http://www.newser.com/story/105724/how-many-terrorists-has-the-tsa-caught.html...

The inspections are geared to disallowing any one person from bringing a sufficient quantity of chemicals onto a plane to make a viable explosive device. Five could, however, bring that quantity on board. In any war the point is to take as many of the enemy with you as you can before they take...

Not on one plane? No. There were five -- the same five you claim cannot be convinced to get on one plane -- on each of four planes. What part of that math do you simply fail to understand? I know damned good and well you aren't stupid so what is the point you are trying to make? You stated...

The last time, they got nineteen -- twenty if you count the one that missed the plane.