Search results

Not the best source, admittedly, but Howard Stern said this morning that there was some correlation between STDs (clamidia I believe he said) and contrating SARS. Maybe these were the 'perfectly' healthy people. Its too early to know whats up with this right now though. I have to agree on...

Indeed, maybe his dream was to come to the US to pursue a career in Hollywood. Maybe he's auditioning.

Hey, you might be on to something. We've solved our long-run funding problems with social security :D Leave it to Bush to find a truly creative solution.

I didn't really follow that, but that guy really has a set to make a statement like that. Maybe there is no war too, its being filmed some where on location :D Maybe he needs to retake Disinformation 101.

:D

Afraid of the French? I think you are giving them a little too much credit. Saddam could probably storm Paris given sufficent motivation to do so :D But maybe the Russians told them not to use them. That might be the case, but facing a no win situation, and certain death, its truly is...

Considering most pesticides are extremely diluted nerve agents, you may have a point, but consider this...why was this stuff recently buried? Why are there weapons at an agricultural plant? If you can come up with a logical or valid reason for the second question in particular, I'd like to...

Labels are fine, but 'communist' and 'socialist' start to become used in a derogatory way here quite quickly. As they should be ;) Just kidding! But as for the duped war supporters. Well, I don't think they are so duped, I think they wanted to get rid of this guy, and they don't honestly...

How about 'most likely' :D

Well, the point is, any war conventional or other will always be prevented by 'sane' world powers, because they would inevitably lead to a nuclear exchange. I just can't see how there could be any sort of limited convential war followed by a cease fire or a treaty. Maybe I'm wrong, but I just...

Actually, if the it was logical to assume that leaders would choose not to use such weapons, then a good portion of the justification for going after Saddam and the rest of the 'axis of evil' is kind of a moot point. Maybe it was the oil then :D Ards, I wish I could reach the same conclusion...

The people (the masses) might choose not to be destroyed (by starting a full scale exchange), but the leaders would not. Do you think Saddam would sit on a nuclear stockpile if he knew he was gonna die anyway? Leaders make decisions, not people. If the people were truly in control, then they...

Soon there will be a decision to overturn this ruling, or to overturn the right to burn the flag. There is too much inconsistency. Those rulings cannot coexist for long!

Are you sure the supreme court decided this? Wow!!! That's clearly a first ammendment violation, either that, or flag burning isn't! Our rights are gettng tossed out the window it seems. Well, I guess we need to stop terrorist these days, we'll worry about freedom when we have more time for...

yes, but anyone who went to war with the US and had them would use them. I don't think anyone has any illusions that a nuclear state would sit on their biggest offensive and defensive assets and let the enemy overrun them and topple their gov't. Thats not a truly rational assumption. Indeed...

More of that 'vast right wing conspiracy' no doubt. Maybe Hillary will help expose it :D

I'd prefer not to try. Looking at the success rate for those patriot missiles, and the size of the Russian nuclear stockpile, I'd rather not find out. Neither side would have any inhabitable cities after we 'took them.' Of course, victory would be tough to define. Would it be the country...

Its here. Can you take it back Luis?

Gonz, some people go through there. Didn't my protests make headlines two weeks ago :D I guess, not, your weather forecasting was off a bit. It was still raining quite heavily in Ft. Wayne so not too many people showed up for my war/gonzo propaganda protest :D Actually, neither did I, but I...

Look at the striking similarities!