Al Gore, my newest hero

Jeslek

Jeslek

Banned
Of the World Idiot's Movement group.

al-gore.jpg


SOURCE: http://www.freedomalliance.org/view_article.php?a_id=185

Al Gore returned to the political stage last week just as he left it seventeen months ago -- as a man who just can’t make peace with the concepts of truthfulness and honesty and has never been able to lasso his wild imagination. Speaking in San Francisco, Al launched a blistering attack on President George W. Bush’s policy toward Iraq and our military’s effort in the war on terrorism. Al's diatribe, in which he accused the President of having "squandered the international outpouring of sympathy, goodwill and solidarity" since September 11, was as wrong as it was mean-spirited. In Gore’s typical haughty style, his pronouncement was delivered from on high and lacked evidence to support his outrageous claims.
Click to expand...
I don't get this man. He really doesn't take pride in defending his country, does he? He'd rather have the world decide the fate of Americans than our leaders. Wuss.

But Gore's old buddy, British Prime Minister Tony Blair disagrees.
Click to expand...
Even Blair has more intelligence. :eek: And he is from a LABOR party.

So just what is Al talking about? Is he referring to German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, whose leftist Social Democrat party won a tight re-election by trashing the United States, most memorably when one of Schroeder's cabinet ministers compared President Bush to Adolf Hitler and was summarily dismissed the day after the election?
Click to expand...
I don't want to bring Germans into this, but I was never fond of them or their anti-American and anti-Israel viewpoints. If they aren't with us they are our enemies. Telling me Bush is Hitler isn't something intelligent to do. We didn't murder 6,000,000 Jews just because we didn't like them.

And while Gore was trying to make liberalism relevant in America by taking shots at the Bush administration, liberal British Prime Minister Tony Blair has been demonstrating real statesmanship.
Click to expand...
Kudos to Mr. Blair, he shows more intelligence than that sheep Gore.

Both Blair and Duncan Smith have emerged as critical allies in America’s war on terrorism. They have not forgotten Winston Churchill’s parting counsel, on the day of his 1955 resignation, when he implored his countrymen to never be separated from the Americans.
Click to expand...
I still want the Brits to vote for Ian Duncan Smith :D

As for Al Gore, the only place he’s likely to be elected is Germany.
Click to expand...
Yes can we please get rid of him? His socialistic unpatriotic tendencies are disturbing. He is a traitor.
 
Al is speaking handicapped. In reality, he is quite a smart man, with very good intentions, unfortunatly his ability to convey those intentions through the spoken word is nearly nil.
 
“I want to state this clearly, President Bush should not be blamed for Saddam Hussein’s survival to this point. There was throughout the war a clear consensus that the United States should not include the conquest of Iraq among its objectives. On the contrary, it was universally accepted that out objective was to push Iraq out of Kuwait, and it was further understood that when this was accomplished, combat should stop.”

That was how Al Gore said he felt about the Gulf War in 1991. Now, 11 years later, this is how Al Gore has a different version of his own feelings:

“Back in 1991 I was one of a handful of Democrats in the United States Senate to vote in favor of the resolution endorsing the Persian Gulf War. And I felt betrayed by the first Bush administration’s departure from the battlefield.”

OK. One of those statements is a lie. Was he lying in 1991 when he said that it was understood that the battle would stop after Iraq was pushed from Kuwait? Or was Gore lying in 2002 when he said he felt betrayed by our departure from the battlefield?
Click to expand...
http://www.boortz.com/nealznuz.htm
 
One workable theory. In the event things go badly in Iraq, Al Bore can claim being "against this war from the start". It doesn't lessen the opposing stances he's taken on the same subject but look to Senate Majority Leader Tom "Puff" Dashchle for leadership skill there. He was the one who sponsored the regime change bill from 1998(?).
 
there is very little chance that ian duncan-smith will be voted in the next election, the tories aren't terribly popular here still. then again, neither are labour at the mo.

you must surely be aware that a country can be with you without agreeing with absolutely everyhting you do? and the moment they disagree they become a crazed enemy to be destroyed becasue *sniff* they don't agree.
how would anyhting get done ever if people sulked the moment they didn't get their own way.
the world works a little more complexly than that. i don't agree with what schroeder said but he apologised. get over it.

you have german support for the war on terrorism, how they conduct it might not be 100% the way you want it but negotiate and get on. just because they don't agree all the time does not automatically turn them into loony terrorist supporting scum. it's not that black and white.

the same goes for gore - he doesn't agree with what's being done doesn't make him a traitor, it makes him a critic.
 
unclehobart said:
One may be a critic certainly... on the other hand, I dislike when they lie about the past.
Click to expand...

past...does that include less than 3 years ago?
 
Speaking of the devil ... I just got this in an email :shrug:

What a difference 14 years make - Anyone remember this??
It was 1987 -- Lt. Col. Oliver North testified at the Iran-Contra hearings during the Reagan Administration.

There was Ollie in front of God and country getting the third degree, but what he said was stunning! He was being drilled by some senator:

"Did you not recently spend close to $60,000 for a home security system?"

Ollie replied, "Yes, I did, sir."

The senator continued, trying to get a laugh out of the audience, "Isn't that just a little excessive?"

"No, sir," continued Ollie.

"No? And why not?" the senator asked. "Because the lives of my family and I were threatened, sir"

"Threatened? By whom?" the senator questioned.

"By a terrorist, sir" Ollie answered.

"Terrorist? What terrorist could possibly scare you that much?"

"His name is Osama bin Laden, sir" Ollie replied.

At this point the senator tried to repeat the name, but couldn't pronounce it, which most people back then probably couldn't. A couple of people laughed at the attempt. Then the senator continued.

"Why are you so afraid of this man?" the senator asked.

"Because, sir, he is the most evil person alive that I know of," Ollie answered.

"And what do you recommend we do about him?" asked the senator.

"Well, sir, if it was up to me, I would recommend that an assassin team be formed to eliminate him and his men from the face of the earth."

The senator disagreed with this approach, and that was all that was shown of the clip.

(If anyone is interested, the senator was Al Gore.)
Click to expand...
 
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/whispers/november2001.htm
That email is an utter fraud. *look halfway down the page on my link* The named terrorist was Abul Nidal .
 
I didn't put much faith into that email ... I thought it was funny that I read that email at the same time I read this post.

14 years ago ... I was 11 years old. The biggest thing in my life was that my sister was just born. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top