Are hate crimes really up ...

jimpeel

Well-Known Member
or are more crimes simply being included as "hate crimes"? Are more crimes being deemed as hate crimes by clairvoyant prosecutors reading suspect's minds as to motive?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312168,00.html

Hate Crimes Rise 8 Percent 2005-06, FBI Says
Monday, November 19, 2007

WASHINGTON — Hate crime incidents in the United States rose last year by nearly 8 percent, the FBI reported Monday, as racial prejudice continued to account for more than half the reported instances.

Police across the nation reported 7,722 criminal incidents in 2006 targeting victims or property as a result of bias against a particular race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnic or national origin or physical or mental disability. That was up 7.8 percent from the 7,163 incidents reported in 2005.

Although the noose incidents and beatings among students at Jena, La., high school occurred in the last half of 2006, they were not included in the report. Only 12,600 of the nation's more than 17,000 local, county, state and federal police agencies participated in the hate crime reporting program in 2006 and neither Jena nor LaSalle Parish, in which the town is located, were among the agencies reporting. justice protest

Nevertheless, the Jena incidents, and a rash of subsequent noose incidents around the country, have spawned civil rights protests in Louisiana and last week at Justice Department headquarters here. The department said it investigated the incident but decided not to prosecute because the federal government does not typically bring hate crime charges against juveniles.

The Jena case began in August 2006 after a black student sat under a tree known as a gathering spot for white students. Three white students later hung nooses from the tree. They were suspended by the school but not prosecuted. Six black teenagers, however, were charged by LaSalle Parish prosecutor Reed Walters with attempted second-degree murder of a white student who was beaten unconscious in December 2006. The charges have since been reduced to aggravated second-degree assault, but civil rights protesters have complained that no charges were filed against the white students who hung the nooses. (So a noose is the same as a life-threatening beating? :confused: --j)

The Justice Department says it is actively investigating a number of noose incidents at schools, work places and neighborhoods around the country. It says "a noose is a powerful symbol of hate and racially motivated violence" recalling the days of lynchings of blacks and that it can constitute a federal civil rights offense under some circumstances.

...

<more>
 
i dunno what's the answer, jim?

I would not pose an interrogatory for which I had an answer because that would make the question rhetorical.

My personal belief, however, is that hate crimes are a figment of prosecutorial imagination. It seems that there is this constant rush to enhance every crime for some reason or another. They add "by a person in a position of trust" or "knew, or should have known" or "whatever we want to say it is" at their sole discretion.

Hate crimes are this etherial aspect of a crime that goes nearly to every crime out there. When someone is beaten, robbed, shot, murdered, etc it is seldom out of love. Trying to preciently determine what was on someone's mind is stupid.

One night, I had a group of people come into my motel and ask for a room. I treated them as I do everyone who came to the motel even though the male had a large, ~7" dia, "WHITE POWER" tattoo. I do know that if he ever gets into a fight with a Black person he will pay a price for that tattoo even if the fight was for nothing more than a true disagreement. He will be charged with a "hate crime" even if the other guy started it.

The problem with hate crimes is that those who demanded them are now starting to find themselves the target. While Colin Ferguson openly admitted that he passed over Blacks on the Long Island Railway and purposefully targeted non-Blacks he was never charged with a hate crime. The laws were in their infancy then and were still a "Whites only" crime. Now that the law is starting to be evenly applied the cry of "racism" goes up. The Jena case is a prime example. Whites hang a noose on a tree and the Blacks nearly beat a White guy to death. Both are being treated as "hate crimes" but the Black leadership has been crying "foul". Apparently, they believe that hate crimes should still be reserved for Whites.

Hate crimes are thought crimes. All we need to complete the equation is the "Minority Report" scenario.
 
Or every crime is a hate crime. One of the two.

Hate crimes, as a class, exist only to prosecute in civil court, or the court of public opinion. As I've said before, I can claim almost anything to be a hate crime if another race is the perpetrator. :shrug:
 
Back
Top