British NHS getting worse

jimpeel

Well-Known Member
The number of patients (patience?) waiting more than 18 weeks for procedures is on the rise and there is no sign of a let-up. Welcome to the future of American health care.

SOURCE

NHS budget squeeze to blame for longer waiting times, say doctors

Latest performance data reveal number of English patients waiting more than 18 weeks has risen by 26% in last year

* James Ball and Denis Campbell
* guardian.co.uk, Thursday 19 May 2011 21.10 BST

Doctors are blaming financial pressures on the NHS for an increase in the number of patients who are not being treated within the 18 weeks that the government recommends.

New NHS performance data reveal that the number of people in England who are being forced to wait more than 18 weeks has risen by 26% in the last year, while the number who had to wait longer than six months has shot up by 43%.

In March this year, 34,639 people, or 11% of the total, waited more than that time to receive inpatient treatment, compared with 27,534, or 8.3%, in March 2010 – an increase of 26% – Department of Health statistics show.

Similarly, in March this year some 11,243 patients who underwent treatment had waited for more than six months, compared with 7,841 in the same month in 2010 – a 43% rise.

Despite rising demand for healthcare caused by the increasingly elderly population and growing numbers of people with long-term conditions, the NHS treated 16,201 fewer people as inpatients in March 2011 compared to March 2010, the latest Referral To Treatment data disclose.

The British Medical Association said the longer waits and fewer treatments were inevitable: "Given the massive financial pressures on the NHS, it was always likely that hospital activity would decrease and waiting times would increase," said a spokesperson.

"The capacity of hospitals has been limited by staffing freezes, and commissioners of care are under pressure to ration surgical procedures considered to be of low value. As well as the personal impact on individual patients, there is a potential long-term consequence for NHS hospitals, which are at risk of being financially destabilised as they lose income."

Labour claimed the figures proved that the NHS was declining as a result of the coalition's health policies. "Another month, another breach of the treatment waiting times target. This is further evidence of the NHS going backwards again under the Tories," said John Healey, the shadow health secretary. "Instead of ploughing on with a wasteful top-down reorganisation of the NHS, David Cameron and Andrew Lansley should now apologise to those patients having to wait longer for treatment."

Katherine Murphy, the director of the Patients Association, said it had heard from people whose hip or knee replacement had been postponed once or twice without them being offered a new date, leaving them in pain and with their independence compromised.

The DH said: "Waiting times go up and they go down, but this data shows that waiting times remain broadly stable. On average, admitted patients waited 7.9 weeks for treatment in March 2011, compared to eight weeks in March 2010. For outpatients it is just 3.7 weeks, compared to 3.8 weeks in 2010."
 
Some wait longer than others. :rolleyes:

These two will be waiting for an eternity.

SOURCE

Two patients died after waiting in ambulance outside 'full' Oldham hospital unit

Exclusive by Amanda Crook and Alice McKeegan

May 21, 2011

Two patients died after being left waiting in ambulances outside an over-stretched hospital.

The patients, believed to have been in their 80s, couldn’t get into the Royal Oldham Hospital for seven and 20 minutes respectively.

They were assessed by ambulance crews as ‘very sick’ and were both suspected of having suffered heart attacks.

The A&E department was so busy that all but the most urgent cases were being sent to other hospitals at the time. All five resuscitation beds at Oldham were full.

The two patients were assessed and treated by a casualty doctor and senior nurse in the ambulances.

It is understood neither actually had suffered a heart attack by the time they were admitted – although both later died at the hospital. One died in the resuscitation unit the following day and the other three days after being admitted to a ward.

A probe has been launched after ambulance chiefs reported the incident to regional health authority NHS North West.

It comes just two months after bosses at Pennine Acute Trust – which runs the Royal Oldham – closed the A&E at neighbouring Rochdale Infirmary.

Trust bosses denied that had left Oldham unable to cope.

They said that while they had been ‘particularly busy’ on the night – last Monday – the two patients had received treatment in the ambulances.

An official said: "We have five adult resuscitation beds in A&E for seriously ill ambulance patients.

"If there are five resuscitation patients in the department then they must be stabilised before they can be moved.

"Ensuring that patients get the right treatment at the right time and in the right place is an absolute priority for us."

The trust said that, in line with national trends, demand for emergency care was 10 per cent higher than this time last year across the trust – which also has hospitals in Bury and North Manchester.

A spokeswoman for the North West Ambulance Service said when A&E departments were struggling to cope, all but life-threatening cases were diverted to alternative hospitals.

Union official Craig Wilde, north west ambulance spokesman for Unison, said: "It is completely unacceptable to leave critically ill patients in ambulances outside A&E departments. It puts our members in a terrible position."

Patients groups said they had reports of significant overcrowding at the hospital.

David Cartwright, from the Patients Council, said: "We have been receiving numerous calls over the past few months regarding Oldham A&E being fit to burst, and on some occasions some patients taking over six hours to be treated.

"A colleague advised that ambulances were eight deep on Monday evening queuing to get access with sick patients on-board."

A spokesman for NHS North West said: "We are working closely with Pennine Acute Hospitals Trust, North West Ambulance Service and NHS Oldham to understand the pressures that the Royal Oldham Hospital A&E was under on the night of May 16 and to see if there are any improvements to be made or actions to be taken."

Pennine Acute said that it had not received any complaints from the families of the patients who died.
 
funny, but the only victims around here seem to be the so-called "conservatives." hey i don't seem to feel like a victim at all. but, then, i can wipe my own ass. and i ain't no "liberal" and i ain't no whiney "conservative" either... but i guess that's what happens when you feel a loss of control over your own shit. sally struthers will be telling your stories soon enough.
 
yeah it is. and you want to tell me about that?

HA HA HA HA HA.

but why am i not whining like a stuck hog like you is, enos?
 
This just in. Read the title of the thread.

SOURCE

Hospital bugs hit an all-time high: Number of patients picking up life-threatening infections has doubled in two years

  • 'Extremely concerning' rise from 22,488 to 42,712 cases in 24 months
  • Poor hygiene on the wards thought to be behind the increase
  • Many affected are elderly, reducing chances of recovery from illness or surgery

By Daniel Martin

Last updated at 9:02 AM on 29th December 2011

A record number of patients picked up life-threatening infections in NHS hospitals last year, alarming figures show.

Poor hygiene on the wards has resulted in those with hospital-acquired infections doubling from 22,488 to 42,712 in just two years.

Most of those affected are elderly, meaning their chances of recovering from the surgery or serious illness they were being treated for in the first place are drastically reduced. The average age of patients battling hospital bugs is 76.

The figures, from the NHS Information Centre, cover all hospital infections including superbugs MRSA and C.difficile and other dangerous illnesses such as norovirus and E.coli. Experts say that while efforts to eradicate the superbugs have had some success, the other avoidable bugs are on the rise.

Only today the Health Protection Agency announced there have been 46 outbreaks of suspected norovirus in hospitals over the past two weeks, with more than half leading to ward closures or restrictions. Since the beginning of October, there have been 244 confirmed outbreaks.

Infection experts warned that some of the diseases are becoming ‘hyper-resistant’ to antibiotics. Critics say that while trusts are getting to grips with familiar superbugs, other infections are slipping under the radar because figures on their prevalence do not need to be submitted to the Department of Health for scrutiny.

The sharp rise in the numbers suffering from hospital infections is mirrored by a similar spike in the compensation the NHS is paying to such patients which reached a record £6million last year.

Hospitals have tried to make wards cleaner by introducing handwash and encouraging patients and visitors to be more aware of the need to be hygienic. Such efforts, however, appear to be in vain.

According to data submitted by hospitals to the NHS Information Centre, in 2010/11, there were 42,712 cases in which a hospital consultant recorded a patient’s illness as being a ‘nosocomial condition’ – that is an infection picked up in a hospital or medical environment.

It is the highest rate in the 13 years for which records are publicly available. In 1998/99 it was just 335.

This year’s figure is up 36 per cent on the 31,447 recorded in 2009/10 and almost double the 22,488 of 2008/09.

Hospital-acquired infections lead to extended stays in hospital of around one month.

Last year patients battling these conditions took up almost 800,000 NHS bed nights and equated to 2,200 beds on a daily basis.

Joyce Robins, co-director of Patient Concern said: ‘This is a terrifying prospect for vulnerable elderly people who think they are going into hospital to get better.

‘It contrasts sharply with the happy propaganda that has been telling us that infection rates had dropped sharply. It is shocking that there seems to be no effective way of motivating hospital managers to stop this appalling waste of money when they are laying off front line staff to cut budgets.’

Earlier this month it emerged that 38 trusts had been affected by outbreaks of norovirus, with many having to close wards. Almost 800 patients were affected.

In the last year, compensation payments to the victims of hospital-acquired infections reached record levels and almost trebled from the previous year’s figure to more than £6million. When the legal costs associated with the cases are added in, the total bill to the NHS came to more than

It means around £30,000 every day is drained out of the NHS budget to pay for the claims of those who pick up life-threatening infections while in hospital, often for routine treatments.

The NHS figures do not break the infections down by type, but along with MRSA and C. diff they are expected to include norovirus, E coli, various urinary tract infections and conditions such as pseudomonas aeruginosa, a bacterial infection that can attack everything from organs to soft tissue.

Epidemiologist Dr Mark Enright, of London’s Imperial College, said: ‘MRSA and C. diff have largely been controlled, because hospitals can get into quite a lot of trouble because they have to report to health authorities.

‘But there are other organisms which are resistant to antibiotics, such as pseudomonas aeruginosa. These are present in the environment but can be dangerous in hospitals, affecting people with depressed immune systems.

‘It can be very difficult to stop them spreading all over hospitals. If you are a nurse on a busy ward at night you can’t always change gloves between patients so you will always get a measure of bacteria transmission.’

Michelle Mitchell, charity director of Age UK, said: ‘This increasing trend of hospital acquired infections is extremely concerning. People over the age of 60 are 88 per cent more likely to acquire these infections.

‘This can be extremely distressing for older patients and their families, and can have a detrimental effect on their recovery.’

A Department of Health spokesperson said: 'These figures are misleading. The NHS has got better and better at tackling hospital infections, demonstrated by the record lows we have seen this year.

'Because we are not complacent, we have introduced mandatory reporting of more hospital infections. That means that we have shone a light on the problems previously swept under the carpet.

But patients should be confident that the measures we have taken will continue the downward trend in hospital infections.'
 
I for one can't wait to take full advantage of my Obama provided free healthcare.
Oh you say he'll be long gone from office by the time it goes into effect?
Well then if I am dissatisfied I will be blaming a Republican administration?
Hah great way to leave em holding the bag.

Wonder what the next hopee changee guy will look like?


2m7j585.jpg
 
Back
Top