Chevy Volt gets all fired up

jimpeel

Well-Known Member
All on fire, I mean. They simply burst into flames after collision damage. Hell, we are but mere laymen and we knew this would happen.

SOURCE

New Post-Accident Chevy Volt Engine Fires Prompt Investigation

Published November 25, 2011 | Associated Press

New fires involving the lithium-ion batteries in General Motors Co.'s Chevrolet Volt have prompted an investigation to assess the risk of fire in the electric car after a serious crash, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Friday.

One Volt battery pack that was being closely monitored following a government crash test caught fire Thursday, the safety administration said in a statement. Another recently crash-tested battery emitted smoke and sparks, the statement said.

GM, which was informed of the investigation on Friday, said in a statement that the Volt "is safe and does not present undue risk as part of normal operation or immediately after a severe crash."

The latest fires are in addition to a battery fire in a crash-tested Volt six months ago.

NHTSA learned of a possible fire risk involving damaged Volt batteries when a fire erupted in a Volt that was being stored in a parking lot a test facility in Burlington, Wis. The fire was severe enough to cause several other vehicles parked nearby to catch fire as well.

The car had been subjected to a side-impact crash test more than three weeks earlier, on May 12, during which the battery was punctured and its coolant line ruptured.

Last week's tests of three battery packs were designed to replicate the May test. In that test, the Volt was subjected to a simulated side-impact collision into a narrow object like a tree or pole followed by a rollover, the agency said.

The first battery tested last week didn't catch fire. But a battery test on Nov. 17 initially experienced a temporary temperature increase, and on Thursday caught fire. Another battery tested on Nov. 18, which was rotated 180 degrees within hours after the test, began to smoke and emit sparks shortly after the rotation.

The tests were conducted by NHTSA and the Energy and Defense departments at a defense facility near Hampton Roads, Va.

So far, no fires have been reported in Volts involved in roadway crashes, NHTSA said. More than 5,000 of the vehicles have been sold.

It's too soon to tell whether the investigation will lead to a recall of any vehicles or parts, but the government will ensure consumers are informed promptly if that occurs, the agency said.

With its OnStar safety communications systems a part of the car, "GM knows real time about any crash significant enough to potentially compromise battery integrity," the automaker said. "Since July, GM has implemented a post-crash protocol that includes the depowering of the battery after a severe crash, returning the battery to a safe and low-powered state."

Electric vehicles are critical to President Barack Obama's plans to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil. He has called for putting 1 million of the vehicles on the road by 2015.

The Volt and Nissan's Leaf, with more than 8,000 cars on the road in the U.S., are among the first mass-marketed plug-in electric cars. They went on sale in the 2011 model year. Other automakers are also working on electric vehicles.

Safety testing hasn't raised concerns about electric vehicles other than the Volt, NHTSA said. But the agency is asking manufacturers who have electric cars on the market, or who plan to introduce electric vehicles in the near future, for more detailed information on their battery testing as well as what procedures they have established for discharging and handling batteries, including recommendations for reducing fire risks.

"NHTSA continues to believe that electric vehicles have incredible potential to save consumers money at the pump, help protect the environment, create jobs and strengthen national security by reducing our dependence on oil," the agency said.

After the first battery fire, GM officials complained that NHTSA did not drain the battery of energy as called for under the automaker's crash procedures. NHTSA normally drains fuel from gasoline-powered cars after crash tests, they said.

Lithium-ion batteries, which are rechargeable, have been the subject of several recalls of consumer electronics. Millions of laptop batteries made by Sony Corp. for Apple Inc., Dell Inc., Lenovo Group Ltd. and other PC makers were recalled in 2006 and 2007 after it was discovered that they could overheat and ignite.

The Federal Aviation Administration issued a warning to airlines about the potential for fires in cargo containing lithium-ion and non-rechargeable lithium metal batteries after a United Parcel Service plane crashed near Dubai last year, killing both pilots. The plane was carrying thousands of lithium batteries.

Incorrectly packaged, damaged or overheated batteries can catch fire, the FAA said. Fires involving lithium-ion batteries can reach 1,100 degrees, close to the melting point of aluminum, a key material in airplane construction. Lithium-metal battery fires are far hotter, capable of reaching 4,000 degrees.

GM and NHTSA have pointed out that cars with gasoline-powered engines are susceptible to fires after a crash.

In the event of a crash, NHTSA's advice to consumers is to do the same thing they would do in a gasoline-powered car -- get out of the vehicle and move a safe distance away. The agency also recommends against storing a severely damaged electric car in a garage or near other vehicles.
 
hmmm. when did you prophesy that they would catch on fire?

So if we do not prognosticate the occurrence it holds no validity? The part you forget is that we can read.

This from a January 2010 report:

SOURCE

Lithium-ion batteries, which are rechargeable, have been the subject of several recalls of consumer electronics. Millions of laptop batteries made by Sony Corp. for Apple Inc., Dell Inc., Lenovo Group Ltd. and other PC makers were recalled in 2006 and 2007 after it was discovered that they could overheat and ignite.

The Federal Aviation Administration issued a warning to airlines about the potential for fires in cargo containing lithium-ion and non-rechargeable lithium metal batteries after a United Parcel Service plane crashed near Dubai last year, killing both pilots. The plane, which was on fire, was carrying thousands of lithium batteries.

Incorrectly packaged, damaged or overheated batteries can catch fire, the FAA said. Fires involving lithium-ion batteries can reach 1,100 degrees, close to the melting point of aluminum, a key material in airplane construction. Lithium-metal battery fires are far hotter, capable of reaching 4,000 degrees.
 
Chevy Volt is fulla fail

If you've the slightest knowledge of automotive engineering
give yourself a real treat and do a cursory study of the Volt.

It's a fricken Rube Goldberg monstrosity!
 
I've read some on it.
Enough to know right nearly from the beginning that I would waste a dime on it.
 
um, did i not mention something before about GM as the worst example of bureaucracy in the universe?
 
Chevy Volt just another Obambo fiasco

If you'll recall your history Gm management cancelled the Volt and
the boy King commanded they build it.

But you knew that already.

I just don't recall if it was before or after he defrauded the stockholders
and turned ownership of the company over to the Union Thugs?
 
"we all know this would happen."

right, jim. keep shooting off those knuckle babies!

If you are going to quote me at least be accurate. That is, after all, what "quote" is supposed to mean.

"... we knew this would happen."

There. Fixed that fer ya.
 
Welcome to Commie World USA

The government takes money from the people & passes it along to a failing automaker, essentially buying that automaker.

The government then forces its minions are the automaker to create vehicles that are not ready for market.

Then the government purchases a gross majority of those inept vehicles.

The automaker, in a show of independence, claims to pay off the "loan", early, (by using money taken from another government pot which was filled by money taken from the people.)

The failed automaker then finds out thier cars that are not market ready nor wanted, are poentially dangerous.

Said automaker then claims it'll buy back all those defective vehicles, to alleviate concerns.

So, 1 automaker, 1 car, purchased 3 times by the American public which didn't want the fucking car in the first place.

But, hey, the UAW is happy.
 
"The automaker, in a show of independence, claims to pay off the "loan", early, (by using money taken from another government pot which was filled by money taken from the people.)"

sure, but that's not an instance of a car being purchased. i think you're on the right track, but the car's only been bought twice.
 
Back
Top