Cyberbullying

GrandCaravanSE

Active Member
When a Los Angeles jury convicted a Missouri woman last week in the online bullying of a 13-year-old girl who then took her own life, it felt like justice.

Lori Drew, 49, angry because the girl had quit being friends with her daughter, impersonated a 16-year-old boy to win the girl's trust. From there, the facts get muddy because Drew was working with her daughter and an 18-year-old employee, and it's not clear who sent which messages. But the fictitious "boy" flirted with the girl, apparently won her over, and then attacked her as "fat" and a "slut," ultimately saying that the "world would be a better place without you." The distraught teen hung herself within minutes.


Link

Watched it last night on Attack of the Show.
 
Where's the charges for the 13 year old's parents for not monitoring her net activity? This could as easily have been a pedo, and from her reaction, she'd have gone to him in a heart beat.
 
Where's the charges for the 13 year old's parents for not monitoring her net activity? This could as easily have been a pedo, and from her reaction, she'd have gone to him in a heart beat.

That is exactly what i though where in the world did the parents go? to tell you the truth i don't seem surprised that those parents were not there. I you have ever played on Xbox live you can tell when the little kids that are maybe 10 or 11 swear there parents are not home to watch them, they just buy them the game to shut them up.
 
US teen cuffed for sending nude phone pics



...of herself

By Dan Goodin in San Francisco •

Posted in Crime, 8th October 2008 23:39 GMT

Free Download - Security Web 2.0

A 15-year-old Ohio girl was arrested on felony child pornography charges for allegedly sending nude cell phone pictures of herself to classmates. Authorities are considering charging some of the students who received the photos as well.

The unnamed student from Licking Valley High School in Newark, Ohio was arrested Friday after school officials discovered the materials and notified police. She spent the weekend in juvenile detention and entered a plea of "deny" on Monday, according to The NewarkAdvocate.com.

Charges include illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material and possession of criminal tools. If convicted, the girl could be forced to register as a sexual offender for 20 years, but because of her age, the judge hearing the case has some flexibility in the matter, an official told the Advocate.

The pictures came to light after a Licking County prosecutor began visiting high schools to educate students on the consequences of transmitting nude photos by cell phone. According to one student interviewed by 10TV News, the teens were warned they could serve 20 years if convicted.

A student later notified an adult of the nude cell phone pictures, and the adult in turn contacted school officials. School officials had pulled the girl aside and warned her about the behavior immediately after the presentation, according to a separate article by the Advocate.

This isn't the first case in which zealous American prosecutors have used child pornography statutes to protect vulnerable juveniles from themselves. In 2004, a 16-year-old girl and her 17-year-old boyfriend took pictures of themselves while naked and engaged in unspecified "sexual behavior." They didn't show the pictures to anyone, but they did send them to the boy's email address.

Eventually each was charged with producing, directing, or promoting a photograph featuring the sexual conduct of a child. The boy was also charged with an extra count of possession of child pornography. As CNET News reported here, the girl's conviction was upheld last year on appeal.

Licking County prosecutors say they have received some 20 cases involving questionable cell phone pictures. They say investigators are trying to determine how many juveniles received nude photos of the girl and have left open the possibility that others will be charged in the incident.

The girl, who is a foster child, remains under house arrest. She is not allowed to have access to a cell phone or the internet except for school purposes and then only with adult supervision. ®



© Copyright 1998–2008

source
 
Wow, i don't see why they should arrst the people that received them, i am sure they if a girl did not want them, but if it was a guy then it was a nice surprise. at anyrate i am sure that it was an unexpected multimedia message from some weird girl.
 
it's media...sounds like spin..
They said "some", makes me think there's something else there. ;)
 
Back
Top