jimpeel
Well-Known Member
This from the ultra right wing rabidly conservative New York Times.
A real "Oh, shit!" for the Democrats.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/25/u...WAY&adxnnlx=1196053908-nOtdEvGZ8h/UtbxVM2yNRQ
A real "Oh, shit!" for the Democrats.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/25/u...WAY&adxnnlx=1196053908-nOtdEvGZ8h/UtbxVM2yNRQ
As Democrats See Security Gains in Iraq, Tone Shifts
As violence declines in Baghdad, the leading Democratic presidential candidates are undertaking a new and challenging balancing act on Iraq: acknowledging that success, trying to shift the focus to the lack of political progress there, and highlighting more domestic concerns like health care and the economy.
Advisers to Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama say that the candidates have watched security conditions improve after the troop escalation in Iraq and concluded that it would be folly not to acknowledge those gains. At the same time, they are arguing that American casualties are still too high, that a quick withdrawal is the only way to end the war and that the so-called surge in additional troops has not paid off in political progress in Iraq.
But the changing situation suggests for the first time that the politics of the war could shift in the general election next year, particularly if the gains continue. While the Democratic candidates are continuing to assail the war — a popular position with many of the party’s primary voters — they run the risk that Republicans will use those critiques to attack the party’s nominee in the election as defeatist and lacking faith in the American military.
<more>