Denver cops: Still some of the worst in the nation

jimpeel

Well-Known Member
This is why I stay the Hell out of Denver unless I simply have to go there. The government is corrupt and the police reflect that corruption. Look at how long this story took to see the light of day.

SOURCE

Jun 17, 2009 9:06 pm US/Mountain

McMenacing? Cop Accused Of Pulling Gun At McD's
Written by Brian Maass
DENVER (CBS4) ―

A Denver police officer has been suspended after allegedly brandishing his gun at a McDonald's restaurant in Aurora after his order took too long to fill.

Aurora police confirmed the CBS4 investigation saying the incident occurred May 21 at the McDonald's at 18181 East Hampden Avenue.

A spokesperson for the Aurora Police Department said they plan to present the case -- now classified as a felony menacing incident -- to the Arapahoe County District Attorney's Office Thursday for possible filing of criminal charges.

Sources familiar with the case, and the fast food worker's account of what happened, say two off-duty Denver police officers placed an order from their car in the early morning hours of May 21. But once at the drive through window, the employee said the men became agitated and angry at how long their food was taking. The men thought they were being ignored, according to contacts familiar with the worker's account. The male clerk then said one of the officer's flashed his police badge and pointed a pistol through the drive through window in a threatening manner, before driving off without paying.

Both officers are assigned to Denver International Airport although only one has been placed on administrative leave with pay, pending the outcome of the case.

(© MMIX CBS Television Stations, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
yeah. and that only happens in denver! because the cops there are especially corrupt.

funny, i've never had a problem there.

and jim has some weird thing about cops, anyway.
 
yeah. and that only happens in denver! because the cops there are especially corrupt.

funny, i've never had a problem there.

and jim has some weird thing about cops, anyway.

Just the bad ones -- who give a bad smell to the good ones. Denver's got more that its fair share of bad ones.

Good or bad, the police are NOT your friend. They will pull you into the system in a hot second for the most trivial of reasons if they can. I have seen too many cops who are willing to abuse their power to intimidate and harm others. The old power corrupts thing.

Denver is a "home rule" city which believes that the state Constitution does not apply to them. What is legal and Constitutional one foot outside of the Denver city limit is illegal one foot inside the Denver city limit. They love to confiscate cars, firearms, etc from those who are merely traveling through the city.

I stay out of there if I can.
 
again, jim, i've never had a problem with a cop. i guess it's simply because i'm courteous, and don't tend to do the kind of really stupid shit that tires them. seems like you're inclined to feel persecuted.
 
The state Constitution says that a citizen may carry a firearm in their vehicle for lawful protection while traveling. If you are found to have a firearm in your vehicle while traveling through Denver the municipal code calls for the confiscation of that vehicle.

Yep. Confiscation for no reason alright.

SOURCE

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Colorado law currently allows persons to carry a handgun in their place of business for lawful protecting, or in their automobile for protection for lawful protection while traveling. (C.R.S. 18-12-105.) Like Denver, Thornton drastically narrows the statewide law, and allows business owners or travelers to carry only when there is a direct or immediate threat! Thus, proprietors of small businesses, or travelers, are deprived of their right to self-protection. Thornton and Denver apparently expect that small business owners will be able to ask robbers to wait a minute with the robbery, so that the owner can lawfully retrieve their handgun.

Denver carrying. Denver Revised Municipal Code 38-117 forbids the concealed or open carrying of any firearm, any knife with a blade greater than 32 inches in length, or any other dangerous or deadly weapon.

The affirmative defenses to Denver Code 38-117 are found in Denver Code 38-118. The affirmative defenses include carrying in a private automobile or other private means of conveyance for lawful protection of self or another person or property, when there is a direct and immediate threat thereto, while traveling away from the area of ones residence or business; being in ones own dwelling, or place of business, or on property owned or under ones control at the time of the act of carrying such weapon; or being a collector or licensed dealer displaying or transporting such weapon for display or sale. All firearms so displayed or transported shall be unloaded at all times.

Denver ban on guns which melt at the wrong temperature. It is unlawful for any person engaged in the business of selling handguns to sell, rent, exchange, or deliver any handgun having a melting point of less 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, or tensile strength of less than 50,000 lbs. per square inch, or metal having a density of less than 7.5 grams per cubic centimeter. This ordinance is ostensibly aimed at protecting foolish consumers from poor quality guns. But the ordinance contains an exemption for police officers. There are only two logical implications which can be drawn from the police exemption:

A. The Denver City Council wants police to use inferior firearms;

B. The Denver City Council wants to disarm poor people by making it illegal to sell inexpensive firearms.

The latter conclusion seems more likely.

Denver ban on guns which frightening in pictures. Denvers assault weapon ban is directly copied--even including typographical errors--from a 1989 California statute. The California statute was created by a few people looking through a picture book of guns, and picking out which guns did not look sporting. The arbitrary list of guns has nothing to do with the guns function; one of the guns banned by Denver is a single-shot shotgun.

The Denver ordinance forbids the carrying, storing, keeping, manufacturing, selling, or otherwise possessing any firearm defined as an assault weapon. It also includes any detachable magazine with a capacity of 21 or more rounds. There is no exemption or affirmative defense for gun shows or exhibits under the ordinance.

Denver juvenile weapons ban: Denvers juvenile weapons ordinance is now touted as the reason for Denvers recent drop in homicides--although the decline in crime in Denver is no greater than the trend in most other large American cities in the same period. And the statewide juvenile handgun law (enacted three months after the Denver ordinance) would remain in place, and restrict most handgun possession by juveniles, even if the Denver ordinance were repealed.

As detailed in a 1993 Independence Institute Issue Paper, the Denver ban goes far beyond any reasonable form of gun control. In Denver, it is currently illegal to allow someone under 16 years old to even touch a gun, even during a safety training class.

It is even illegal for a father and son to drive to a hunting trip in the Yampa Valley, with an unloaded rifle in the rack of a pick-up truck.


Denver property confiscation law: Denvers property confiscation law does not create additional gun controls, but does impose draconian penalties on based on the other gun ordinances.

Among other things, put, the ordinances allow the confiscation of the gun and the car of people with concealed handgun permits who travel through Denver.

The ordinances make a mockery of due process; for example the ordinances declare that judges must enforce them without regard to...the culpability or innocence of those who hold these rights. (Denver R.M.C. 37-70(a).) In some barbaric countries, courts impose a standard of guilty until proven innocent. But the Denver ordinance is even worse than this barbaric standard; the Denver rule that even if you prove yourself innocent, the government will still take your property.
 
Back
Top