Ever get one of these?

HeXp£Øi±

Well-Known Member
Division of Student Services
University of xxxx xxxxxxxx
Ph# xxxxxxxxxxxxx

May 5, 2003

Hi,

I’m writing to you because a computer registered in your name has surfaced on the Top Talkers List of April 2003. The Top Talker List records students who are using an inordinate amount of bandwidth to the Internet during any particular month. More specifically, any user name or IP address that moves more than 10 gigabytes of data during the course of 30 days is listed.

This memo is to inform you that you have exceeded 10 gigabytes of bandwidth for this month and in the future, the University will be “shaping” this type of traffic to the Internet (meaning less speed and connectivity). Although this shaping will not occur until later this summer, we want you to be aware of this action and the potential illegal activity you are engaging in.

The University is taking this action for several reasons. First, the cost of bandwidth usage is increasing as the amount of bandwidth moved off campus continues to rise. At local market rates (e.g. GCI), each gigabyte of traffic costs $20. Just at the 10-gigabyte limit, this is $200/month. Secondly, with the belief that the majority of this traffic is illegal Peer-to-Peer file sharing (with programs such as KaZaa and Morpheous), and that most traffic is non educational, the University must protect itself against liability. Finally, as a student you are potentially violating copyright law by downloading and distributing music and movie files on the Internet. Copyright laws have undergone some significant changes during the “digital age.” The basic idea of copyright is to give the person who does the hard work of creating something new and original the legal control over when, where, and how that work is reproduced and distributed. The federal “NET Act” (No Electronic Theft Act) of December 1997 provides for criminal prosecution of individuals who engage in copyright infringement. Just this month, four students at other universities were sued by the RIAA (Recording Industry Artists Association) for copying and sharing Mp3s via the web. The lawsuit asked for $150,000 for each copyrighted song that was shared. How much would you be sued for?

Additional information can be found at the following web sites:
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at xxxxxxx. There is no action needed on your part, but be mindful that future excessive bandwidth usage will be addressed. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Assistant Dean of Students
 
Yikes. Aren't you on a T1?

But the dollar/ traffic thing sounds seriously fucked. Prolly got a nasty letter from RIAA...and it scared them.
 
hehe, i used to download shedloads of stuff at work and never even so much as a sniff of a warning. well, only the one about 'stop using p2p you bandwidth hogging bastards' but everyone got that one ;)
 
T2 actually. Good thing they're not charging me those prices. I probably hit 10gigs within the past 48hrs alone. Only a week left and dammit i'm going to make use of it! I think that was actually a computer generated letter. Besides, i would think they'd be much more focused on uploaders than downloaders. I do very little uploading.
 
Anyway:
The basic idea of copyright is to give the person who does the hard work of creating something new and original the legal control over when, where, and how that work is reproduced and distributed
This is such bullshit when it comes to music... at least in my country where the artist gets something like 5 cents for every CD sold. Copyright is about the music companies protecting their huge profit margins selling overpriced CDs and giving the artists the finger.

Some musicians over here have even declared in public that they don´t give a damn about their music being pirated in the net. They don´t lose a thing. So little money they get to see.
 
Q said:
Prolly got a nasty letter from RIAA...and it scared them.

Nah, the universities have become paranoid to the potential threat & are banding together to "stop this thievery". Almost all colleges are freaking out. It's okay to go to school as a middle class white boy & return 4 years later as a black transexual lesbian but don't you dare steal a Metalligreed song :D
 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/30554.html

I know it's The Register, and they can be a bit, um, biased, but...

The New York Times reveals the record companies are preparing a program called "silent", which "Locks up a computer system for a certain duration - minutes or possibly even hours - risking the loss of data that was unsaved if the computer is restarted," the Times tells us. "It also displays a warning about downloading pirated music."

This latest bombing campaign follows the RIAA's attempt in October to get bombing prohibited from limited damages: a daring and unusual move for a bomber. Bombers usually light a fuse and then run away, or fly away at a very high altitude, but this bomber wants to return to the scene of the crime and deny the victims their right to get recompense for the destruction. That was the Berman Bill.

One other program can only be described as a kind of psychological "All Your Base" campaign, only for real. It deletes all the MP3s it can find on your computer so you have to buy the music again in DRM'd form. And then your music will truly belong to them, because once the DRM noose is around your neck, they only need to tighten it."


That shit scares the hell out of me. Not really the programs, they really don't bother me a bit, there will be programs out to stop them the day they are released, if you know where to look, but it's the invasion they are planning. It's one thing to expect payment for services rendered. I agree with that philosophy, when I was laying carpet, I had to demand payment from several customers, however, if they did not pay it did not give me the right to throw bricks through their windows, vandalize their car or house, or inflict damages upon them in any way. This is what they are asking to do, and it is wrong.

I am just very thankful there are companies out there like Verizon that are willing to stand up to these people and say it's not right. If it was left up to you and me, mp3 would be a thing of the past already.
 
Back
Top