Ho Hum...

Squiggy

ThunderDick
I guess haliburton was the most qualified food service company too...So much money...so little time to steal it all... :swing:


Halliburton Halts More U.S. Billings

Monday February 16, 3:34 PM EST

By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Halliburton Co. said on Monday it would defer billing for an additional $140 million in meals for U.S. forces in Iraq and Kuwait until a discrepancy is reconciled between the number of meals ordered and those actually served.

The Houston, Texas-based oil services company said it was holding off billing until an agreement was reached on subcontractor services for meal planning, food purchase and meal preparation for troops.

Halliburton is the biggest contractor for the U.S. military in Iraq with more than $8 billion in deals covering everything from doing laundry, building bases and providing meals to helping rebuild the oil industry.

Its contracts have drawn intense scrutiny from Democrats because of its ties with Vice President Dick Cheney, who ran the company from 1995 until 2000.



Last week, Halliburton said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing it had agreed to delay billing for $34.5 million while Defense Department auditors weigh whether its subcontractors overcharged for meals in Iraq and Kuwait.

The additional $140 million in suspended billing was for food services already provided to U.S. forces in Iraq and Kuwait, the company said.

"It is important to understand that this is not any sort of 'admission'," said Randy Harl, president and chief executive of Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root. "As a responsible government contractor it is the right thing to do."

The company said it would continue working with the military to reach agreement on bridging the gap between meals ordered by the Defense Department and those actually served.

Wendy Hall, a Halliburton spokeswoman, said the hold on related billing would continue indefinitely, "until an agreement is reached."

The company has also been in the spotlight over whether it overcharged as much as $61 million for fuel delivered to Iraq.

Kuwait's parliament formed a committee on Monday with broad powers to probe the deal to supply Halliburton with fuel for the U.S. army in Iraq.

Halliburton welcomed "another independent examination of this issue because there have been a lot of erroneous reports in the U.S. and international media," Hall said.

"The facts show that KBR delivered fuel to Iraq at the best value, the best price, and the best terms and in ways completely consistent with government procurement policies."

In a separate dispute, Halliburton refunded the U.S. government $6.3 million after acknowledging that one or two former employees apparently took kickbacks from a Kuwaiti subcontractor.

Last week, the Pentagon said Halliburton had become its seventh biggest contractor in fiscal 2003, up from the 37th place the year before, propelled by reconstruction work in Iraq and Bosnia.
 
Squiggy said:
Last week, the Pentagon said Halliburton had become its seventh biggest contractor in fiscal 2003, up from the 37th place the year before, propelled by reconstruction work in Iraq and Bosnia.

anyone know who numbers 1 through 6 are?
 
They certainly are making a nice little profit off of this venture, eh?
 
Well, they fronted Cheney 10 mil, I guess you'd call this the payoff for buying an elected official. Seems like he sold out cheap to me. :shrug:
 
What amazes me is that Haliburton has jumped from $0.5 Billion to $3.9 Billion.....and they expect everyone to believe it's simply because they are suddenly so wonderful in what they do? :retard:
 
AlphaTroll said:
What amazes me is that Haliburton has jumped from $0.5 Billion to $3.9 Billion.....and they expect everyone to believe it's simply because they are suddenly so wonderful in what they do? :retard:

I'll try and answer this through my personal observations...

Kellogg, Brown, and Root, mentioned in Squiggy's post makes so much because the armed force reductions in the Reagan years (when GHW Bush was vice) left the military with too few people to handle every area deemed necessary by the DoD. That work was out-sourced to Clown and Hoot (my personal view of the company) for less than the cost of sending US personnel to fill those commitments. Why?...Third Country Nationals(TCN's)...that's why. They hire a few US citizens (mostly prior service) to supervise 10 to 20 TCN's, and "save" money by not having to pay a GI housing, food, and medical costs at foreign prices. Halliburton, through Clown and Hoot, had their foot in the door from that point on. It also helps that Bush, Sr., Reagan, and even Bill Clinton owned stock in the company, ensuring their continued use.
 
That explains where they come from, Gato. Thanks. It doesn't explain the price gouging and profiteering, which I am afraid I believe is done with government assistance. Paid government assistance. Note however, that I do not consider this anything new. Still think it's wrong though.

It also helps that Bush, Sr., Reagan, and even Bill Clinton owned stock in the company, ensuring their continued use.

Can you say kickback? I knew that you could. ;)
 
chcr said:
That explains where they come from, Gato. Thanks. It doesn't explain the price gouging and profiteering, which I am afraid I believe is done with government assistance. Paid government assistance. Note however, that I do not consider this anything new. Still think it's wrong though.



Can you say kickback? I knew that you could. ;)

According to "the powers that be", though, it's still cheaper to 'outsource' those jobs. Of course, now there's a problem with retainability due to the constant TDY activity and the slow drain-off of benifits...

Guess those 'in the know' forgot the old saying...

"Countries that do not respect their military wind up with an army that cannot defend it."
 
Gato_Solo said:
According to "the powers that be", though, it's still cheaper to 'outsource' those jobs.

Considering what I know of the military pay and benefit scale, that seems more or less impossible. :shrug: Less profitable for the powers that be, maybe.


"Countries that do not respect their military wind up with an army that cannot defend it."
Truer words have never been spoken.
 
Back
Top