In a mess at cbs...

HeXp£Øi±

Well-Known Member
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX MON JAN 10, 2005 20:03:45 ET XXXXX

RATHER STAYS HOME; EXECUTIVES SPLIT; MOONVES LOOKS TOWARDS FUTURE

*Exclusive**

CBSNEWS veteran Don Hewitt called Dan Rather's disappearance from Monday's Evening News "really stupid" during a damage control meeting on Monday, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

One top source inside the CBS Broadcast Center claimed Rather was told to stay off the air on Monday, as a form of punishment!

Chief Washington Correspondent Bob Schieffer was called in to anchor the damaged ship.

CBS staffers were shocked Monday when CBS president Les Moonves suddenly tied Rather's upcoming resignation to the phony document flap, a departure from CBS's official storyline.

Moonves explained in a memo: "Dan Rather has already apologized for the segment and taken responsibility for his part in the broadcast. He voluntarily moved to set a date to step down from the CBS EVENING NEWS in March of 2005... after examining the report and thinking about its implications, we believe any further action would not be appropriate."

In the emotional speech to the CBS newsroom first announcing his resignation last November, Rather was very clear to co-workers that his departure from the evening news was not because of the Bush story.

"No matter what you hear elsewhere, this was a mutual decision," Rather explained. "The timing has to do with wanting to separate the decision to leave the anchor chair from the 60 MINUTES report."

XXX DRUDGE REPORT XXX
 
The strange thing is that, both times, the "please collect your things and leave" speech was delivered by a guy named John Holmes. :lloyd:
 
abooja said:
The strange thing is that, both times, the "please collect your things and leave" speech was delivered by a guy named John Holmes. :lloyd:


From a distance of greater than or less than fourteen inches away? :lloyd:
 
SouthernN'Proud said:
From a distance of greater than or less than fourteen inches away? :lloyd:

I don't think she was hanging around the cemetary when that happened...at least, I hope not. :sick:
 
abooja said:
:D

At the time, I had no idea of the significance of his name. He sure was a putz, though.

Schmuck...putz is a little one, schmuck is el pene grande. ;)
 
Gato_Solo said:
Schmuck...putz is a little one, schmuck is el pene grande. ;)
I remembered that. Trust me, I never saw it, but I'm willing to bet that dude had a tiny one. :p
 
Let's examine the best part of this overblown investigation, meant to coverup more than examine.

page 38 said:
The Panel is aware that some have ascribed political motivations to 60 Minutes Wednesday’s decision to air the September 8 Segment just two months before the presidential election, while others further found political bias in the program itself. The Panel reviewed this issue and found certain actions that could support such charges. However, the Panel cannot conclude that a political agenda at 60 Minutes Wednesday drove either the timing of the airing ofthe Segment or its content.
No? How about this you imbeciles

page 71 said:
Today I am going to send the following hypothetical scenario to a reliable, trustable editor friend of mine . . .
What if there was a person who might have some information that could
possibly change the momentum of an election but we needed to get an
ASAP book deal to help get us the information?
What kinds of turnaround
payment schedules are possible, keeping in mind the book probably could
not make it out until after the election . . . . What I am asking is in this best
case hypothetical scenario, can we get a decent sized advance payment,
and get it turned around quickly.
Then they will respond with some possible scenarios of what they could
do. When we get to Burkett’s house I will have at least some scenarios to
show Burkett about what could happen if he played ball with the
documents. If he shows us what we want, then I can call my friend and
tell him the real details and start the process.

Without Dan Rather being immediately FIRED, this report has no validation & CBS has no credibility.
 
So, for example, if CBS's own hired lawyer, Mr. Thornburgh had found that the document in question was actually a fraudulent Department of Defense document, or that anyone at CBS subjectively believed the document was fraudulent before they used devices of interstate commerce to broadcast it, he might have exposed CBS to criminal and civil liability on both forging government documents and wire fraud charges. The Thornburgh/Boccardi Report makes no such conclusion, although it does present facts that might lead a reasonable person to reach such a conclusion.

Washington Times
 
Back
Top