Inclusiveness to the nth degree

[SouthernN'Proud]

San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors has passed a resolution banning comments that are deemed insensitive to people based on their race, religion, color, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, weight, height or place of birth, reports the San Francisco Chronicle.

Board President Aaron Peskin says the move is not, however, an attack on free speech. San Francisco has always been a champion of that, he says. "We must make every possible effort to maintain basic decorum and integrity in our public forum," he says. "Failure to do so has the same chilling effect as stifling free speech."

Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier wants to go even further. She some kind of training for city commissioners so that they can identify inappropriate public comment and put a stop to it.

"This resolution is a good first step, but it can't be a last one," she said.

**end**

Well folks, it's finally here. Say hello to the Thought Police.

Good thing I don't live in SannyFranny. I'd be in trouble already for what I been calling this wench. But at least she wouldn't be allowed to call me an ignorant redneck hillbilly in return I suppose.

 

[Professur]

"We must make every possible effort to maintain basic decorum and integrity in our public forum," he says. "Failure to do so has the same chilling effect as stifling free speech."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but ... this is stifling free speech. So I might make a comment that some over-sensitive PC wackjob might find offensive. Get over it. It's call growing up. Not running to teacher because l'il Johnny called you a runny-nosed snot-picker.

This is what happens when you try to treat everyone equally.

 

[unclehobart]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but ... this is stifling free speech. So I might make a comment that some over-sensitive PC wackjob might find offensive. Get over it. It's call growing up. Not running to teacher because l'il Johnny called you a runny-nosed snot-picker.

This is what happens when you try to treat everyone equally.

We the editors have rejected your comment based upon the following reasons:

Correct: Stating that a singular position is superior instead of the multicultural rainbow where nothing is right or wrong.

me: Both selfish and taking the position of individuality.

I: Both selfish and taking the position of individuality.

wrong: White males are precluded from tonalities that might be seen as accusatory or proclaiming a superior position. It is sexist, racist, ageist, and homophobic.

using italics: profoundly accusatory and demeaning. Hatemonger!

stifling free speech: White males are no longer permitted to use this phrase.

etc, etc...

 

[SouthernN'Proud]

l'il Johnny called you a runny-nosed snot-picker.

Since finding this little article, I've been trying to come up with one insult that covers every grounds the article mentioned.

race, religion, color, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, weight, height or place of birth

My progress so far:

Ancestry: Motherf**ker
Age: Old
Sex: Bastard
Orientation: I bet you can figure out the term here without me spelling it out
Weight: Fat
Height: Sawed-off
Place of birth: Redneck, cracker, hillbilly...take your pick

Anyone inspired to help?

 

[Professur]

Bastard would be ancestry.

 

[HomeLAN]

Motherfucker could also speak to sex.

He simply got 'em reversed.

 

[SouthernN'Proud]

Ayup. Sorry.

 

[Gato_Solo]

SnP...How's about a link?

 

[HomeLAN]

He said San Francisco Chronicle.

 

[Gonz]

The 9th Circuit will get this case & agree with it & then be overturned by the US Supreme Court for the 4 gazillionth time.