Iraq 'preparing for chemical war'

HeXp£Øi±

Well-Known Member
Saddam Hussein has been rallying support at home
Iraqi documents obtained by the BBC indicate that Baghdad is equipping key units with protection against chemical weapons.
The handwritten papers smuggled out by the Iraqi opposition refer to new chemical warfare suits to protect soldiers and distribution of the drug atropine to counter the effects of nerve gas.

The notes, passed on by the opposition Iraqi National Coalition (INC), also included details for attacking ships in the Gulf.

The INC says the notes came from members of Baghdad's military.

Iraq's Republican Guard and Special Republican Guard are among the recipients of special suits and atropine, the BBC's Gordon Corera reports.

US claims support

The disclosure comes as the United States says it is confident of international support in the event of military action against Iraq, despite misgivings by other leading world powers.
Friday, 24 January, 2003, 08:28 GMT
Iraq 'preparing for chemical war'
Pro-Saddam demonstration in Baghdad
Saddam Hussein has been rallying support at home
Iraqi documents obtained by the BBC indicate that Baghdad is equipping key units with protection against chemical weapons.

We know from multiple sources that Saddam has ordered any scientist who cooperates during interviews will be killed

Paul Wolfowitz
US Deputy Defence Secretary
Click for more on Iraq's arsenal

The handwritten papers smuggled out by the Iraqi opposition refer to new chemical warfare suits to protect soldiers and distribution of the drug atropine to counter the effects of nerve gas.

The notes, passed on by the opposition Iraqi National Coalition (INC), also included details for attacking ships in the Gulf.

The INC says the notes came from members of Baghdad's military.

Iraq's Republican Guard and Special Republican Guard are among the recipients of special suits and atropine, the BBC's Gordon Corera reports.

US claims support

The disclosure comes as the United States says it is confident of international support in the event of military action against Iraq, despite misgivings by other leading world powers.

Open in new window : Who backs war?
Where key nations stand on Iraq

"I don't think we will have to worry about going it alone", American Secretary of State Colin Powell said, expressing the hope that differences could be overcome.

The latest report of Iraqi war preparations is bound to intrigue UN weapons inspectors, the BBC's Rageh Omaar reports from Baghdad.According to a UK Government report last year and UN inspectors' findings, Iraq has undeclared stocks of VX and Sarin nerve agent. It is thought Iraq could deploy such chemicals quickly.

Meanwhile, the US Government has been stepping up its case for tougher action against Saddam.

In a key speech in New York, US Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz recited a long list of instances in which, he said, Iraq was still lying about and concealing its weapons programmes.

"Today we know from multiple sources that Saddam has ordered any scientist who cooperates during interviews will be killed, as well as their families," Mr Wolfowitz said.

Earlier in Baghdad, Iraqi officials had said they were encouraging scientists to speak to the UN, but six had so far resisted efforts to question them alone.

"We did our best to push the scientists but they refused such interviews without the presence of representatives of Iraq's National Monitoring Directorate," Iraq's chief liaison officer Hossam Mohammed Amin told a news conference.

Concerns

France and Germany have expressed strong resistance to military action, and China and Russia on Thursday both voiced deep reservations about military action.Beijing was "worried and uneasy" about the large-scale military build-up in the Gulf, Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue said.

Russia - which like France and China has power of veto as a permanent member of the Security Council - has also challenged the US position, saying there is no evidence that would justify a war in Iraq.

Russian President Vladimir Putin told President Bush in a telephone conversation that "the main criterion" in assessing the situation in Iraq should be the weapons inspectors' findings.

The weapons inspectors are due to present their crucial report to the Security Council on 27 January.

Rift

The growing differences between the US and some of its allies could hinder efforts to reach a consensus on the next course of action over Iraq.

Mr Powell said the US Government would listen carefully to the report and consult with friends and allies, but he again indicated the United States might not wait for Security Council approval to attack Iraq.

"If it can't be solved peacefully and if the UN should fail to act, and I hope that is not the case, then the United States reserves the right to do what it thinks is appropriate to defend its interests," Mr Powell said.

"I'm quite confident, if it comes to that, we will be joined by many nations," he said at a joint news conference with UK Foreign Secretary Jack Straw.

In a sign of regional concern over the Iraqi crisis, Iraq's neighbours met on Thursday to consider ways of averting a showdown.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2690163.stm
 
We warned saddam during the gulf war that if he used chemical or biological weapons that we'd kill him for sure so he refrained. This time he knows we're coming for him so there'll be no holding back on his part. If he has them he'll use them on us unless of course we can get to the majority of them first.
 
To add to the trouble...Israel insists that if attacked by Iraq that it will resond this time. I can pretty much guarantee that Iraq will attack Israel again. This might very well bring lebonon into the mix(rockets across the border) and even Iran(for funding lebonon) and ...... yeah...this could get extremely ugly. Even the top notch analysts don't seem to offer a clear picture as to how this might play out. At the least it's going to be very interesting.
 
Actually, some of his defectors said that commands to launch chemical/biological weapos was given but, because of Iraq's loss of communications and command and control, the orders were never received at the front. :shrug:
 
I saw something on cnn the other night that said during and after desert storm we treated over 100,000 of our desert storm troops for injuries and illnesses.
It's entirely possible he did get some of those weapons launched. Another possibility is that in the process of destorying such large quantities of poisonous chemicals it's inevitable that some of your troops are going to breath that air.
 
I'm pretty sure he did get some launched, my bro was over there and he came back with some pretty weird sicknesses for a year or so afterwards. Said alot of the guys in his co. were the same way.
 
Back
Top