Jackson hosts kids' party {WTF!!!}

A.B.Normal

New Member
One of the youngsters shouted, "We love you."

"I love you more," Jackson replied before putting an umbrella over his head and walking back toward his house.
Friday's visitors, from six organizations and ranging in age from about 3 or 4 years to their teens, were bused to Neverland and then rode a train up from the parking lot. They included children with special needs from Santa Barbara and some affiliated with the First AME Church in Los Angeles, according to a list of groups issued to reporters. Jackson defense attorney Thomas Mesereau Jr. attends the First AME church.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Music/12/18/jackson.party.ap/index.html

whattha.gif
 
Jackson, who faces trial next year on child molestation charges, appeared happy during the few minutes he spoke to the arriving throng.

One of the youngsters shouted, "We love you."

"I love you more," Jackson replied before putting an umbrella over his head and walking back toward his house.

WTF-so lets ship kids in on a bus nevertheless....Where are these ppl's minds at? :confused: :alienhuh:
 
Mare said:
WTF-so lets ship kids in on a bus nevertheless....Where are these ppl's minds at? :confused: :alienhuh:

See Mikes lawyer,
See Mikes lawyer handing out cash

man%20with%20money.jpg
 
Knowing Michael Jackson it could have been just about anything... even a 20% off Bed, Bath, and Beyond certificate ... but the 99% money is on adult porn. Now wether it was boy or girl porn... that remains to be seen.
 
Fingerprints on porn may link Michael Jackson, boy




E-mail this article
Print this article
Search archive
Most read articles
Most e-mailed articles


Fingerprints belonging to both Michael Jackson and the boy accusing him of child molestation were found on pornographic magazines seized from Jackson's Neverland ranch last year, the Santa Barbara News-Press reported yesterday, citing sources it did not identify.

If the reported evidence is admitted during Jackson's trial, prosecutors would be expected to argue that the fingerprints were proof that Jackson showed the boy pornographic literature before molesting him. But the defense could question whether the entertainer knew the boy had been leafing through the magazines.

According to the newspaper, the boy and his brother often visited Neverland when Jackson wasn't home.

Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville is expected to decide next month what evidence can be admitted at trial, scheduled to begin Jan. 31.

Jackson, 46, has pleaded not guilty to charges of child molestation, conspiracy and administering an intoxicating agent, alcohol, to his alleged victim.

Investigators most recently searched Jackson's Neverland home on Dec. 3 and 4, and on Dec. 4 the entertainer voluntarily gave them a DNA sample at their request. Investigators first searched the home on Nov. 18, 2003, shortly before Jackson was charged.
 
Some parents never learn. They home deliver victims right to a child molester.


Off with their damn heads. For the sake of the children.
 
SouthernN'Proud said:
Some parents never learn. They home deliver victims right to a child molester.


Off with their damn heads. For the sake of the children.

I still can't believe that they're doing this. If somebody is being accused of child molestation for the second time, then those people shipping their kids off to his ranch ought to get a visit from DSS. Obviously, they don't care much for their children.

Now...getting back to the porn...

How many of us read our dad's porno mags when he wasn't around? That left fingerprints as well, but it didn't make our dad a child molester...;) It's not evidence, but the DA knows his case is very thin, when 'mom's' actions are taken into account...
 
Gato_Solo said:
I still can't believe that they're doing this. If somebody is being accused of child molestation for the second time, then those people shipping their kids off to his ranch ought to get a visit from DSS. Obviously, they don't care much for their children.

They don't. They're either blindly supporting the pervert for reasons of their own, mind-bogglingly stupid, or wanting to (in current parlence) "get paid". Helluva way to get a few grand, doncha think?

Off with their heads.
 
Gato_Solo said:
How many of us read our dad's porno mags when he wasn't around? That left fingerprints as well, but it didn't make our dad a child molester...;) It's not evidence, but the DA knows his case is very thin, when 'mom's' actions are taken into account...

If he knew that he was having children around without his supervision, what was he doing leaving porn around where it could be found? :shrug:
 
My son had some of his dad's under his mattress. Gotta say it happens. Not sayin MJ is in the right here, just that if it's in the house, the kids'll get it.
 
The difference between our dad & Michael Jackson...

Our dad didn't help us ejaculate.
 
Back
Top