Libertarians say 'no' to raising debt limit

G

Gotholic

Well-Known Member
WASHINGTON - As Republicans and Democrats in Washington continue chewing the scenery in their 'Debt Limit Theater,' Libertarian Party Chair Mark Hinkle released the following statement today:

"Everything I've heard from Washington politicians about the debt limit is nonsense. I propose the simplest option: Do nothing. Don't raise the debt limit, period.

"None of the deals I've heard would do anything to cut federal spending. Some reduce the rate of growth a little bit, but I'm afraid that doesn't count.

"And of course, some of the proposals would increase taxes, which Libertarians are totally opposed to.

"The best outcome would be no deal at all. If the debt limit is not raised, then the federal government will have to cut its spending by over 40%. That would be the best outcome for the future of America, and it's certainly the preferred outcome for Libertarians. (It reminds me of the World's Smallest Political Quiz, produced by the Advocates for Self-Government, which includes the libertarian option to 'Cut taxes and government spending by 50% or more.')

"I'm actually shocked at how resistant both the Republicans and Democrats are to making cuts. I wasn't expecting much, but their proposals are downright embarrassing.

"For example, consider Speaker Boehner's plan. According to the Cato Institute, the Boehner plan doesn't cut spending. It just sets the spending increases slightly below the imaginary Congressional Budget Office (CBO) 'baseline.'

"According to the CBO report released yesterday, the Boehner plan has practically no effect on the deficit in 2012, the only year that really matters. In fact, the Boehner plan actually increases Pell Grant spending by $4 billion in 2012. (So does the Reid plan in the Senate.)

"Of course, the Reid plan largely takes advantage of massive errors in the CBO baseline to claim 'cuts.' (For example, the CBO predicts absurdly high levels of spending for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.)

"As usual, Republicans and Democrats are trying to create the illusion of a high-stakes game between two vastly different visions. In fact, their visions are practically identical. I hope Americans will see through all the smoke, and consider the Libertarian option to make real reductions in the size and scope of government, across the board."

For more information, or to arrange an interview, call LP Executive Director Wes Benedict at 202-333-0008 ext. 222.

The LP is America's third-largest political party, founded in 1971. The Libertarian Party stands for free markets, civil liberties, and peace. You can find more information on the Libertarian Party at our website.
Click to expand...

Source
 
The House needs to keep putting pressure on the Senate to bring the
"cut, cap, and balance" to the floor.

The House already did it's job. The senate and pres. just need to pass it.

When Reid says he isn't going to pass the 'new' house plan, when he hasn't
even seen the final, I think that tells the story.
The pres. and Reid keep saying one thing, but doing the opposite.
Politics, plain and simple.
 
catocom said:
The House needs to keep putting pressure on the Senate to bring the
"cut, cap, and balance" to the floor.

The House already did it's job. The senate and pres. just need to pass it.

When Reid says he isn't going to pass the 'new' house plan, when he hasn't
even seen the final, I think that tells the story.
The pres. and Reid keep saying one thing, but doing the opposite.
Politics, plain and simple.
Click to expand...

"For example, consider Speaker Boehner's plan. According to the Cato Institute, the Boehner plan doesn't cut spending. It just sets the spending increases slightly below the imaginary Congressional Budget Office (CBO) 'baseline.'

"According to the CBO report released yesterday, the Boehner plan has practically no effect on the deficit in 2012, the only year that really matters. In fact, the Boehner plan actually increases Pell Grant spending by $4 billion in 2012. (So does the Reid plan in the Senate.)

"Of course, the Reid plan largely takes advantage of massive errors in the CBO baseline to claim 'cuts.' (For example, the CBO predicts absurdly high levels of spending for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.)
Click to expand...

It seems the "cut, cap, and balance" isn't going to do much.
 
isn't that the second Boehner plan they are referring to, and not the one already passed, and in the senate?
 
seems so on the senate side.
There seems to be a slight divide in both parties now between the senate and house.
 
Kill baseline budgeting. If I understood correctly, the way the CBO scores crap, if they were do an immediate freeze, in the next two years, it would be considered a nine trillion dollar cut.

Allow the "default" to happen. Our tax base is somewhere near two hundred billion, per month. Ain't no grannies going hungry & the Corporals will all get theirs, as will the Chinese.

Pass a balanced budget amendment & come October, present a fiscal year budget, as instructed by the Consitution, then send it to the Senate. Allow them to look bad. We're already 850+ dayts without a budget & raising it for the (nearly) 70th time won't do squat.
 
No Gonz it will add hundreds billions of debt Which is what they are about to do :(
 
no matter how you slice it we are screwed

2iqih5i.jpg
 
what's really screwed up is that the intresty on the current debt is like prime.
It's not fixed, and the holders can jack up the rate any time they want.

That kind of debt has to be nipped asap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top