Love

Which is better?

  • To have loved, and lost that love

    Votes: 18 100.0%
  • To have never loved at all...

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    18
Well, if you've never loved at all, does that mean you could still find someone tomorrow? Otherwise, it seems like you've tilted the balance unfairly towards 'loved and lost.' :eh:
 
Yes, whether you've lost and lost or never loved at all you have equal chance of finding someone to love in the future.
 
Nixy said:
Yes, whether you've lost and lost or never loved at all you have equal chance of finding someone to love in the future.

Oh... okay.


Well, what about some other options then, like...

Loved, got married and had a couple of loud, obnoxious children, but it was cool...
Loved and lost when she ran off with my sister...
Never loved at all, but made lots of money and got laid on a regular basis...
Loved and lost, not only her, but the house and the pick-up truck, too...
Never loved, but had a deep and lasting mono-sexual relationship...
Loved and caught some sort of STD...
Never loved at all, but beat every computer game ever made...
Loved and lost, then shot the bitch as she was leaving work with her new boyfriend...
 
In my case, I would have preferred never to have loved at all, but then again it wasn't really love either, cause it was one-sided. Me.

On the other hand, maybe one-sided love is possible.

But either way, my past 3 ex-periences left me quite bitter towards love. I'm not sure if I could ever really love again, at least in the way you're supposed to. :(
 
unclehobart said:
doesnt exist... *dry fires a .40 Glock into rt. temple*

Jesus Christ. Do we need to go through the loading procedure again?
 
oh, i lost my love but i don't htink it was as TRUE as it could have been anyway

I have met a new guy who i think i will love more
 
i did it thrice, got my ass handed to me on a silver platter... they were even nice enough to include the heart on the side, no extra charge. :retard:
 
Back
Top