The term or related terms for "oil war" not be used regarding the US when it's so obvious the United Nations is th eone that has a thing for oil.
Earlier we had the Oil-for-Food debacle with Kaffe & Jaques as prime movers & shakers. Of course there isn't a mainstream newspaper in the US willing to bite the hand that feeds it.
Now, I stumble across this litle dity
FoxNews
Earlier we had the Oil-for-Food debacle with Kaffe & Jaques as prime movers & shakers. Of course there isn't a mainstream newspaper in the US willing to bite the hand that feeds it.
Now, I stumble across this litle dity
John Danforth, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said “the government of Sudan has been complicit in a terrible disaster that’s been imposed upon the people of Darfur,” the western Sudanese province where 50,000 black Africans have died following attacks by government-supported Arab militias.
“The position of the U.S. is that we’re just not going to do nothing,” said Danforth, an Episcopalian minister and former Republican U.S. senator from Missouri, who began his work at the United Nations earlier this year. On Sept. 6, 2001, President Bush appointed Danforth special envoy to Sudan.
The United States doesn't want a repeat of genocide in Rwanda, when 800,000 Tutsis were slaughtered. Plus, officials are constantly concerned that instability could attract terrorists like Usama bin Laden (search), who once lived in Sudan.
The United States is pushing for U.N. sanctions against the east African nation. But U.S.-sponsored resolutions have met resistance in the U.N. Security Council — particularly from China and Pakistan, which have major oil deals in the African country. Algeria, which is a fellow Arab league member, also is an obstacle.
FoxNews