in a general sense i don't think that such photos should be released due to practical considerations, though ideologically i suppose i (mostly, but apparently not completely) believe in transparency.
this does not depend on who is in office, though i would find it mildly more amusing to correlate such photos with bush and co., given their moralizing bullshit about bringing freedom, democracy, and human rights to iraq and afstinkastan.
yeah that's it. next you'll be chastising him for polluting the water supply because he urinates into porcelain like the rest of us.
oh but obama really believes that's what he's doing, Right? I don't seem to see the Big pullout he campaigned on.
... ROCK THE CASBAH... ROCK THE CASBAH!sharif still don't like it.
we're gonna see a lot of the condemnation of bush polices continuing.
Get use to it.
If they prosecute bush, they'll have to out themselves as well, so you will
see more and more how not many in gov. period, give a crap about the pubic really.
So you did support the release under bush, but not obama?
The lawsuit by the ACLU was filed the lawsuit back in the Bush days. It's been trapped in the courts ever since.The Pentagon had planned to release the photos by May 28 in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union. That decision was made after the Justice Department lost its latest round in federal court and concluded that any further appeal probably would be fruitless.
Pres. Obama was going to release the photos in accordance with the court's decision but was persuaded to hold onto them for the time being by high ranking military personnel who felt the release of the photos would put our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan in danger of retaliation and fuel the terrorists' cause.Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Wednesday that Odierno was the most vocal opponent of releasing the photos and that he shared his concerns with Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
"Odierno was really the one who persuaded the secretary that this had to be fought and the secretary completely agreed," Morrell said.
Gates, in turn, vocalized the concerns to Obama in a series of discussions over the past weeks, Morrell said.
The belief of most of the commanders overseas was the potential the photos had to "incite violence and serve as a potential recruiting tool for terrorists" was too big to let happen without more of a fight.
It only means the photos will be "leaked" instead of "turned over".
The images emerged from Australia yesterday where they were originally obtained by the channel SBS in 2006 in the wake of the Abu Ghraib scandal. They were not distributed around the world at the time but are now believed to be among those the president is trying to block.
This is where I'm leaning, because I think these photos would do harm to the soldiers, as well as other US citizens, overseas. I think there is a time and a place for everything. Eventually the pictures can be released, but right now it would be poor judgment to do so. Reputation gets tarnished and we can all live with that, but you can't get a life back once it's gone.What good would the release of these photos achieve?
Good for the President. He chose wisely.
Why? and to what end?
This is where I'm leaning, because I think these photos would do harm to the soldiers, as well as other US citizens, overseas. I think there is a time and a place for everything. Eventually the pictures can be released, but right now it would be poor judgment to do so. Reputation gets tarnished and we can all live with that, but you can't get a life back once it's gone.
But I do think that eventually, when our troops are back home, that these pictures can be released. The truth will set us free and we will be able to find who we really are again. I think there is still hope for this country and that we can again hold our heads high, being proud to be Americans. There has been a lot to be ashamed of in the recent past and I'm looking forward to cleansing this country of the foulness.was then, is now.