Overlooked by CAPTURED news

Gonz

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Well now. More unsubstantiated proof of the link that doesn't exist.

Telegraph said:
A document discovered by Iraq's interim government details a meeting between the man behind the September 11 attacks and Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist, at his Baghdad training camp. Con Coughlin reports.


For anyone attempting to find evidence to justify the war in Iraq, the discovery of a document that directly links Mohammed Atta, the al-Qaeda mastermind of the September 11 attacks, with the Baghdad training camp of Abu Nidal, the infamous Palestinian terrorist, appears almost too good to be true.

Most of the claims relate to meetings between al-Qaeda and Iraqi intelligence to discuss co-operation on matters such as funding, training and equipment.

Prior to the discovery of the document published today by the Telegraph, the most controversial report related to the suggestion that Atta had met Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, a senior Iraqi intelligence officer, in Prague in April 2001.
Click to expand...

Telegraph
 
*ducks in terror of the bombings about to start here cause some joe communicated overseas to plan a dastardly New Year's Eve plot thing while living in Canada
 
Prior to the discovery of the document published today by the Telegraph, the most controversial report related to the suggestion that Atta had met Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, a senior Iraqi intelligence officer, in Prague in April 2001
Click to expand...

http://msnbc.msn.com/Default.aspx?id=3701101&p1=0

That reported meeting was used by conservatives within and outside the Bush administration as evidence of a link between former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda, the group responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. In the run-up to the war, U.S. President George W. Bush argued that invading Iraq was part of his administration's anti-terrorism campaign.

U.S. officials cautioned that Ani may have lied to interrogators about the meeting, but the CIA and FBI eventually concluded that the meeting probably did not take place and that there was no evidence that Saddam's government was involved in the Sept. 11 hijack attacks, the Times said.
Click to expand...

If they are using this "new" info to backup the original "intelligence",I find it dubious.
 
oh, they don't know...
well then yous DEFINITELY should have gone after Iraq :retard:
 
How convinient must it be to Bush to find Saddam and then some missing links to WTC attacks.

Hint: Upcoming elections
 
Luis G said:
How convinient must it be to Bush to find Saddam and then some missing links to WTC attacks.

Hint: Upcoming elections
Click to expand...

Convenience is the mother of invention.
 
Luis G said:
How convinient must it be to Bush to find Saddam and then some missing links to WTC attacks.

Hint: Upcoming elections
Click to expand...


hot damn!!!!!

Bush controls the British press too. Now I'm impressed.
 
chcr said:
Nope, just the news from Iraq.
Click to expand...

Nice try, chcr, but the British press has the same freedom to run about Iraq as the US soldiers. In fact, the press goes places the soldiers won't go to. How can you say that the news coming from Iraq is controlled by the Bush administration when you haven't even been there?
 
A document discovered by Iraq's interim government
Click to expand...

Stinks to high heaven.

Con Coughlin reports.
Click to expand...

And of course they only gave it to this jamoke because of his boyish good looks, wit and charm?

When something stinks, it stinks and this smells bad.
 
Update

Dec. 17 - A widely publicized Iraqi document that purports to show that September 11 hijacker Mohammed Atta visited Baghdad in the summer of 2001 is probably a fabrication that is contradicted by U.S. law-enforcement records showing Atta was staying at cheap motels and apartments in the United States when the trip presumably would have taken place, according to U.S. law enforcement officials and FBI documents.
Click to expand...
http://msnbc.msn.com/Default.aspx?id=3741646&p1=0
 
Back to the word "probably". MSNBC sure knows how to go out on a limb. :rolleyes:
 
:hmm: You sure embraced that word with loving arms when it gave you hope of going to war and having people die. :rolleyes:
 
There was no probably. Agains, ask the Iranians. And teh Kurds. And...
 
Gonz said:
There was no probably. Agains, ask the Iranians. And teh Kurds. And...
Click to expand...
Okay, so we trust the Iranians this week? Kurds? Those would be the Iraqi Kurds who Saddam tried to exterminate and had no involvement whatsoever in Iraqi government which is why we invaded Iraq or something...
CIA Report-no link between AL-Qaida and Saddam.
by John T. • Sunday November 16, 2003 at 09:02 PM
The CIA has found no evidence that Saddam Hussein tried to transfer chemical or biological weapons or technology to al-Qaida or any other groups, according to a new American report.
Click to expand...
[Adam Boulton, Sky News (London):] One question for you both. Do you believe that there is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct link, and the men who attacked on September the 11th?
THE PRESIDENT: I can't make that claim.
Click to expand...
Try to keep up with the current propaganda... :D

Really though, they can't keep the shit straight themselves, why should you be expected to?
 
We don't need to trust the Iranians. We have film :p

As far as the link goes :shrug: we'll see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top