Ron Paul On Meet The Press 10/23/11

Poor old Ron Paul dealing with idiots for you

his ideas are doomed to fail
because they are right
and make too much sense
 
If only he weren't an isolationist...

Well, RON PAUL for FED CHIEF!!!!
 
We are not the world's policeman?

No no no Gonz
isolationism can work

If we withdrew from the world
it would result in WWIII like what allowed
Hitler to rise to power.

Then we could swoop in save the world again
and be number one for the next century
while the other nations glowed from the nuclear bombs
 
If only he weren't an isolationist...

Well, RON PAUL for FED CHIEF!!!!

Paul is not an isolationist, he is an non-interventionist.

Ron Paul is not even close to being an Isolationist. Isolationists have to have both of the following policies:
  1. Protectionism – No trade or friendship with other nations.
  2. Non-interventionism – Political rulers should avoid entangling alliances with other nations and avoid all wars not related to direct territorial differences (self-defense).
Ron Paul is the opposite of a Protectionist and would open up free trade with every country in the world. That is far from isolationism. It is the same foreign policy of peace and prosperity that Thomas Jefferson wisely suggested; “Commerce with all nations -- entangling alliances with none."

The proper term for people like Jefferson and Paul is “non-interventionist”.

Source

Ron Paul on WWII

Did American Isolationism Cause Hitler to Come to Power?

No serious historian has been willing to make such a simplistic and senseless case in public. One of the most comprehensive histories of the Nazi era was written by William L. Shirer, a journalist assigned to Germany during the period when the Nazis came to power. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich covers 1,143 pages, the first 276 of which describe the multiple forces and events that led to the rise of Hitler. American isolationism is not once mentioned in that section of the book.

The next 594 pages describe the beginning of World War II up to the point at which Hitler declared war on the United States as a result of "Adolph Hitler’s reckless promise to Japan …." It was Japan’s attack of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 that brought the United States into World War II. Germany and Italy declared war on the United States four days later.

Following America’s disastrous foray into World War I, there were strong feelings in the United States about remaining outside of the European conflict. The newly formed America First Committee was the most visible and vocal example of that sentiment. Shirer dedicates a single paragraph to the role of American isolationism at the beginning of Chapter 25, "The Turn of the United States." He also mentions the role of Charles Lindbergh as the leading public isolationist in a footnote on Page 827. Otherwise, there are no references to American isolationism in this extensive work about this period.

So if William Shirer virtually dismissed the importance of American isolationism in causing World War II, what does he have to say about the real causes of the rise of Adolph Hitler and World War II? Shirer points out that a number of causes and events contributed, including:

  • Economic, political, social and cultural devastation following World War I (especially the Weimar hyperinflation from 1918–1923, the Wall Street-debt-financed boom of the late 1920s, and the Great Depression of the 1930s)
  • A disastrous peace treaty at Versailles, including reparations to the allied powers considered unjust by the German people
  • The bitter struggle between international socialism (the Communists) and national socialism (the Nazis)
  • Failure of other European nations to appropriately defend themselves
  • The "stab in the back" myth that anti-war Germans during World War I had given virtual aid and comfort to the enemy on the home front while the valiant solders fought to defend the Fatherland (the birth and growth of this myth is addressed extensively in Chapter 2, "Birth of the Nazi Party")

In Shirer’s opinion, the ‘stab in the back’ fallacy was a primary cause of the rise of Hitler: "Thus emerged for Hitler, as for so many Germans, a fanatical belief in the legend of the ‘stab in the back’ which, more than anything else, was to undermine the Weimar Republic and pave the way for Hitler’s ultimate triumph." (Page 31)

On January 30, 1933 Hitler was appointed chancellor of a coalition government in Germany. The America First Committee was formed September 4, 1940. Clearly, isolationism in the United States had nothing to do with Hitler’s rise to power.

Source
 
Paul is not an isolationist, he is an non-interventionist.

Source

Ron Paul on WWII

Source

you can call the fucker whatever you want.

i saw meet the press. paul legitimized the occupy wall street morons in the same breath as he mentioned the tea party, essentially as equivalent. or at least that is what a lot of pissed off republicans are gonna hear. not popular with the kids.

his rationalization of 9/11 comes out as "9/11 was OUR fault" to the kids.

i don't care how many $25 "straw polls" you and your buddies shell out for, he's absolutely not electable on a national level. he seems like a kook to far too many people. he's got about 90% of things right, but about 10% of the time this kinda happens...

exorcist_02.jpg
 
Back
Top