Sanctions lifted

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Now Bush can sell some oil :dance: :rofl2:

UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. Security Council lifted economic sanctions on Iraq Thursday, giving U.N. support to U.S. and British control of the country until a democratic government is installed, and clearing the way to rebuild the country with oil revenues.

The council voted 14-0 in favor of the U.S. resolution to lift the sanctions, which were imposed on Saddam Hussein's regime in 1990. The 15th council member, Syria, did not attend the vote.

"The lifting of sanctions marks a momentous event for the people of Iraq," U.S. ambassador John Negroponte said after the vote. "It is the turning of a historical page that should brighten the future of the people and the region."

Negroponte said Saddam and his murderous regime prolonged the sanctions for 13 years, and he added: "The liberation of Iraq has cleared the path for today's action."

Pakistan's U.N. Ambassador Munir Akram and other council diplomats said they expect Iraqi oil exports to resume quickly once sanctions are lifted.

The resolution's approval was secured Wednesday night when Russia, France and Germany said they would support it rather than abstain. The United States made over 90 changes to the document to get those countries on board. Once that happened, the United States and its allies were certain that China would follow suit.

Russia, France and Germany were the main opponents of the U.S. war effort in Iraq and have posed diplomatic stumbling blocks to issues concerning the country since then.

French Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sabliere said the resolution is far from perfect, but he said "we believe that it now provides a credible framework" for the U.N. to lend support to the rebuilding effort and to preserve the role of international weapons inspectors.
 
I would like to know if the US stands to profit from this. I mean it cost a lot of money to go into Iraq. Are the taxpayers getting their money's worth?:confuse3:
 
Of course there's profit to be made.....

At the end of the day, however, ideology is only good for bull sessions in the board room and the bar. Something has to grease the skids, to make the whole thing worthwhile to those involved, and entice those outside the loop to get into the game.

Thus, the payout.

It is well known by now that Dick Cheney, before becoming Vice President, served as chairman and chief executive of the Dallas-based petroleum corporation Halliburton. During his tenure, according to oil industry executives and United Nations records, Halliburton did a brisk $73 million in business with Saddam Hussein's Iraq. While working face-to-face with Hussein, Cheney and Halliburton were also moving into position to capitalize upon Hussein's removal from power. In October of 1995, the same month Cheney was made CEO of Halliburton, that company announced a deal that would put it first in line should war break out in Iraq. Their job: To take control of burning oil wells, put out the fires, and prepare them for service.

Another corporation that stands to do well by a war in Iraq is Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton. Ostensibly, Brown & Root is in the construction business, and thus has won a share of the $900 million government contract for the rebuilding of post-war Iraqi bridges, roads and other basic infrastructure. This is but the tip of the financial iceberg, as the oil wells will also have to be repaired after parent-company Halliburton puts out the fires.

More ominously is Brown & Root's stock in trade: the building of permanent American military bases. There are twelve permanent U.S. bases in Kosovo today, all built and maintained by Brown & Root for a multi-billion dollar profit. If anyone should wonder why the administration has not offered an exit strategy to the Iraq war plans, the presence of Brown & Root should answer them succinctly. We do not plan on exiting. In all likelihood, Brown & Root is in Iraq to build permanent bases there, from which attacks upon other Middle Eastern nations can be staged and managed.

More from the article here.
 
and their executives and shareholders, some of whom may or may not be in office... ;)
 
So flavio, are you supporting the U.S. and Britain in their persual to lift the sanctions or do you side with France, Russia, Germany, and so on to keep sanctions in place?
 
They did initially oppose it... Maybe they just voted in favor because if they didn't the world would notice they are even more irrelevant.
 
Back
Top