Tamil Tigers end 25 year Sri Lankan Civil War

valkyrie

Well-Known Member
Tamil Tigers offer to 'silence our guns' in Sri Lanka conflict
(CNN) -- The Tamil Tiger rebels in Sri Lanka said Sunday they have "decided to silence our guns" as government forces closed in on their last stronghold.
Sri Lanka's defense ministry says this handout photo shows troops with a captured Tamil Tiger craft Thursday.

It is not the first time the rebels have called for an end to fighting when backed into a corner by the Sri Lankan military. But should they follow through on their announcement, the decision would potentially end a bloody 25-year civil war in the country.

"This battle has reached its bitter end," Selvarasa Pathmanathan, a spokesman for the rebels said in an "urgent statement" posted Sunday on Tamilnet.com, a pro-rebel Web site.

"It is our people who are dying now from bombs, shells, illness and hunger. We cannot permit any more harm to befall them. We remain with one last choice -- to remove the last weak excuse of the enemy for killing our people. We have decided to silence our guns," he said.

Sri Lanka's President Mahinda Rajapaksa is expected to announce that "military operations" against the Tiger rebels have ended in an address to the nation from Parliament on Tuesday, the government said Sunday.

The rebels -- formally known as the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) (LTTE) -- have fought for an independent state for minority Tamils in Sri Lanka since July 1983. As many as 70,000 people have been killed since the civil war began.

Government forces have trapped the remaining rebels in a small stretch of land in the north of the country -- and possibly thousands of civilians with them, an international aid worker in the country told CNN.

The civilians are "under intense fire" and "essentially on their own" in the area, which the government says contains only rebels, the aid worker said.

The Tigers themselves claim 25,000 civilians are dead or dying, a rebel identified as Col. Soosai said in a statement on Tamilnet.com.

Independent confirmation was not possible since media are not allowed into the area.

Reports indicated fighting had intensified as troops scrambled to clear a remaining 1.2 square kilometers before the government could announce that military operations had ended.

The army destroyed six Tamil Tiger boats and killed 70 rebels in a lagoon on the western edge of a no-fire zone early Sunday, Sri Lanka's Media Center for National Security said.

Sri Lanka's prime minister warned Saturday that his country "stands on the brink," as its soldiers cornered Tamil Tiger fighters in an assault which the United Nations fears is trapping more than 50,000 civilians on a small plot of coastal land.

Government troops seized the last remaining coastal stretch under the control of Tamil Tiger rebels, the Ministry of Defense said Saturday.

The seizure marks the total capture of coastline territory previously controlled by the rebels, it said, after army divisions advanced from the north and south to link up.

An international aid worker said the United Nations was expecting about 20,000 of them to arrive in refugee camps Sunday. There were no medical services in the no-fire zone, the aid worker said.

The Media Center for National Security claims 50,097 have come out of battle zones.

Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa returned from Amman, Jordan, on Sunday. Rajapaksa was attending a summit of developing nations and the World Economic Forum.

In an address to the summit in Amman on Saturday, Rajapaksa said the Sri Lankan armed forces had defeated the rebels.

"I will be going back to my country Sri Lanka that has been totally freed from the barbaric acts of terrorism of the LTTE. This freedom comes after 30 long years," Rajapaksa said.

Many interested parties outside the country have said that the Tamils have legitimate grievances which spurred the bloody civil war. Let's hope that this action does not end in more sanctions against the Tamils but rather to bring them into the political fold.
 
In this case, oh Hell yeah!
They should just keep going til the ‘jobs done’.

I've been hearing (reading) about this crap
in that part of the world for the last quarter century.

If not outright genocide then certainly something
nearly as effective. If they don't kill em all, they will
at the very least have to keep them crushed under an iron boot.

Far easier to kill em all than leave the infestation active.
 
I know there has been horrible bloodshed, but consider that they have been persecuted violently themselves for quite some time. I have a feeling that if the events had happened to either of you that you might have reacted the same way.

The Sinhalese have practiced legal discrimination against the Tamils since independence in 1948.
 
It is not the first time the rebels have called for an end to fighting when backed into a corner by the Sri Lankan military. But should they follow through on their announcement, the decision would potentially end a bloody 25-year civil war in the country.

"This battle has reached its bitter end," Selvarasa Pathmanathan, a spokesman for the rebels said in an "urgent statement" posted Sunday on Tamilnet.com, a pro-rebel Web site.

"It is our people who are dying now from bombs, shells, illness and hunger. We cannot permit any more harm to befall them. We remain with one last choice -- to remove the last weak excuse of the enemy for killing our people. We have decided to silence our guns," he said.

I don't see a lot of grey area here. They claimed surrender in the past, and then took up arms again. You only get one shot at that. Their whine that now it's their people getting killed ... I didn't see them worrying too much when it was the other side's civies taking the hit.

As for civies in the area .... three things to say. First off, giving comfort to the enemy has always been a capital offence. Second, guerilla warfare is their stock and trade. Third ... sorry, but collateral damage has always been a part of war.

This is exactly the same issue the Us is facing about guatanamo. They know there are innocents in there, but how to separate them from those who hide amongst them. But you have to be honest enough to place the blame for those deaths upon those who hide amongst them.
 
I don't see a lot of grey area here. They claimed surrender in the past, and then took up arms again. You only get one shot at that. Their whine that now it's their people getting killed ... I didn't see them worrying too much when it was the other side's civies taking the hit.

As for civies in the area .... three things to say. First off, giving comfort to the enemy has always been a capital offence. Second, guerilla warfare is their stock and trade. Third ... sorry, but collateral damage has always been a part of war.

This is exactly the same issue the Us is facing about guatanamo. They know there are innocents in there, but how to separate them from those who hide amongst them. But you have to be honest enough to place the blame for those deaths upon those who hide amongst them.
Oh, absolutely. The Tamil Eelam (a.k.a., Tigers) hid themselves among their civilian neighbors, making them human shields. Blame for the vast majority of Tamil civilian deaths lies on their heads (but not all). However, you can't ignore that no steps were taken to rid the country of the legal discrimination against the Tamil minority after the cease fire. In fact, it got worse.
 
Legal discrimination is ... legal. Not a whole lot to do about it, really. Wimmen were legally discriminated against in the US, and then the laws changed. Blacks were legally discriminated against in the US, and then the laws changed. I don't recall that the Black Panthers helped their brothers much with their bombs and guns.
 
Legal discrimination is ... legal. Not a whole lot to do about it, really. Wimmen were legally discriminated against in the US, and then the laws changed. Blacks were legally discriminated against in the US, and then the laws changed. I don't recall that the Black Panthers helped their brothers much with their bombs and guns.
Demonstrations made those changes happen. Standing up for what's right made those things happen. Many women lost their lives, were brutally beaten and imprisoned during some of those Suffragette demonstration. Many civil rights workers and demonstrators lost their lives, were brutally beaten and imprisoned during the Civil Rights demonstrations. None of them had to stand with arms because the US has a legal avenue for such change (it is in The Constitution) but when you change the laws so that it is illegal to even make the request for fair treatment then you force a bad situation. The Sri Lanka government caused the problem by making it illegal to present the grievances. Bad for everyone.
 
Back
Top