Jeslek
Banned
Source: http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27955
This is definitely a step towards controlling people. How can you justify a law like this? I mean, I wouldn't go around insulting people just for the fun of it, but I do have a right to say something derrogatory to someone. What is the difference between saying to someone, "You fag," or "You are so stupid."? Both are insulting.
This is amusing.
Oh brother. Fuck them. They are supposed to be an ally:
They would rather protect someone that killed 3,000 humans than deliver him so that justice can be served.
Either that, or I think WE should withdraw from NATO. A bunch of shitheads across the atlantic whining about protecting the poor people's human rights and blalsaelgfbwaleugb FUCK THEM. This guy sort of sums it up:
Agreed. Cowards.
I agree.
That is right. Why should WE help THEM, and we HAVE helped them NUMEROUS times in history, but they whine about something as trivial as extraditing those SOBS in their countries?
I think we should go into the Axis of Evil and take them all out as soon as possible, as fast as possible, and FUCK the EU on the way. Their political correctness is sending them down the toilets.
/rant off
If you think political correctness is out of control in America – and it is – Europe is even worse. A few weeks ago the Swedish parliament passed a bill that would change its constitution to ban speech that is insulting to homosexuals or other "alternative lifestyles."
This is definitely a step towards controlling people. How can you justify a law like this? I mean, I wouldn't go around insulting people just for the fun of it, but I do have a right to say something derrogatory to someone. What is the difference between saying to someone, "You fag," or "You are so stupid."? Both are insulting.
And if Olaf is living in your Stockholm neighborhood and is housing a herd of reindeer or something, you'd better not say, "Hey, Olaf, your alternative lifestyle is bringing down property values around here." That could land you in front of a judge.
This is amusing.
But far more serious is the constant politically correct nonsense that is inhibiting the war on terror. Germany says it will not hand over primary source documents to the United States linking accused terrorist Zacharias Moussaoui to al-Qaida funding because Moussaoui could get the death penalty if convicted in a Virginia federal courtroom.
Never mind that some of the 9-11 terrorists used Germany as a staging area and a money funnel, the Germans are now indignant that we may execute a guy who could be partially responsible for killing 3,000 human beings.
Oh brother. Fuck them. They are supposed to be an ally:
This kind of dopey policy is infuriating, but it is also dangerous. If Germany doesn't want to execute convicted mass murderers, fine; the country can do what it wants. But if murders occur in another country – Germany has no right to say a word. And if it is our NATO ally, and if this is a war on terror, then Germany has an obligation to help the USA any way it can.
They would rather protect someone that killed 3,000 humans than deliver him so that justice can be served.
If it doesn't fulfill that obligation, Germany should withdraw from NATO.
Either that, or I think WE should withdraw from NATO. A bunch of shitheads across the atlantic whining about protecting the poor people's human rights and blalsaelgfbwaleugb FUCK THEM. This guy sort of sums it up:
The entire European Union is a problem in the war on terror, not just Deutschland. The EU has told the Bush administration that it has a "problem" with trying captured terrorists in front of military tribunals. Well, pardon me, EU, but blank you.
Agreed. Cowards.
If the United States government designates that a terrorist is a prisoner of war, then that prisoner can be legally tried in front of a military tribunal. And if the EU doesn't like it, it can kiss our croissants, if you know what I mean.
I agree.
If a terrorist kills somebody in Paris, United States policy is to help out in any and every way. We don't hold back because the French legal system is the opposite of ours – you are presumed guilty there instead of innocent. We do not intrude into the national security matters of other countries. Yet, some of those countries constantly intrude on our right of self-defense.
That is right. Why should WE help THEM, and we HAVE helped them NUMEROUS times in history, but they whine about something as trivial as extraditing those SOBS in their countries?
President Bush is making a large mistake by not asking Congress to officially declare war on terrorists. That should happen immediately so we can put to rest the debate over whether terrorists operating on foreign soil – as that Jose Padilla did – are criminals or prisoners of war. Even if you are an American citizen, if you enlist in al-Qaida or Hamas or any other terrorist group – you are a battlefield combatant and the military should deal with you.
I think we should go into the Axis of Evil and take them all out as soon as possible, as fast as possible, and FUCK the EU on the way. Their political correctness is sending them down the toilets.
/rant off