THIS is too far

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Politics that is even beyond my ability to grasp. To top it off, it's done by a major newspaper, not a party.

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 04, 2005 11:35:09 ET XXXXX

NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN

**Exclusive**

The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

Both children were adopted from Latin America.

A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper's "standard background check."

Roberts’ young son Jack delighted millions of Americans during his father’s Supreme Court nomination announcement ceremony when he wouldn’t stop dancing while the President and his father spoke to a national television audience.

Previously the WASHINGTON POST Style section had published a story criticizing the outfits Mrs. Roberts had them wear at the announcement ceremony.

One top Washington official with knowledge of the NEW YORK TIMES action declared: “Trying to pry into the lives of the Roberts’ family like this is despicable. Children’s lives should be off limits. The TIMES is putting politics over fundamental decency.”

One top Republican official when told of the situation was incredulous. “This can’t possibly be true?”

Developing...
 
Gonz said:
Politics that is even beyond my ability to grasp. To top it off, it's done by a major newspaper, not a party.


These poor children. I agree that it's taking it way too far. The children were adopted and given a home with what we hope is a loving family. Why drag their names into the situation. Saying it's standard procedure is such bullshit.
 
If it bleeds, it leads. Nothing sells papers like controversy and misery. You never know what you'll find if you lick the bottom of enough stones.
 
A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper's "standard background check."
[Novak]Well, I think that's bullshit.[/Novak] :D
 
all is fair in love and politics...

who knows maybe the the adoption was illegal? I guess you will never find out if you don't ask.
 
I doubt that someone as smart as Roberts seems to be would f-up an adoption. Leave the kids alone.
 
Back
Top