Well spoken

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
There is a certain attitude in the world, by some, that says that it's a waste of time to try to promote free societies in parts of the world. I've heard that criticism. Remember, I went to London to talk about our vision of spreading freedom throughout the greater Middle East. And I fully understand that that might rankle some, and be viewed by some as folly. I just strongly disagree with those who do not see the wisdom of trying to promote free societies around the world.

If we are interested in protecting our country for the long-term, the best way to do so is to promote freedom and democracy. And I -- I simply do not agree with those who either say overtly or believe that certain societies cannot be free. It's just not a part of my thinking. And that's why during the course of the campaign, I was -- I believe I was able to connect, at least with those who were there, in explaining my policy, when I talked about the free election in Afghanistan.

There were -- there was doubt about whether or not those elections would go forward. I'm not suggesting any of you here expressed skepticism. But there was. There was deep skepticism, and -- because there is a attitude among some that certain people may never be free -- they just don't long to be free or incapable of running an election. And I disagree with that. And the Afghan people, by going to the polls in the millions, proved -- proved that this administration's faith in freedom to change peoples' habits is worthy. And that will be a central part of my foreign policy. And I've got work to do to explain to people about why that is a central part of our foreign policy. I've been doing that for four years.

But if you do not believe people can be free and can self-govern, then all of a sudden the two-state solution in the Middle East becomes a moot point, invalid. If you're willing to condemn a group of people to a system of government that hasn't worked, then you'll never be able to achieve the peace. You cannot lead this world and our country to a better tomorrow unless you see a better -- if you have a vision of a better tomorrow. And I've got one, based upon a great faith that people do want to be free and live in democracy.
 
Good speech writers can do wonders. I am sure if Bush could he would win the peace in the middle east. I am equally sure he means well even if the ends don't justify the means. I just don't think it can be done. Too many religious extremist in the mix. We may yet be able to install a working democratic government in Iraq but even so there will be much resistance, and I don't think there is an end in sight to that resistance. Good intentions mean nothing to the arab religious zealot.
 
Interesting take. Especially when it wasn't part of his speech, it was part of the Q&A
 
Well then maybe he pulled one out of his ass, but it's still possibly the work of a speechwriter, as they do write for contingencies. Whether or not it's all genuine Bush doesn't matter. It is well said, if a bit naive. There is some considerable evidence that at least a large part of the Arab world has no such desire to live free under a democracy.
 
Correct oh enlightened one. They are commonly referred to as terrorists and their opinion doesn't count.
 
According to my brother, who is in Iraq right now, the people in that area have no concept of what democracy is. They don't get it. All they have ever known are dictators, warlords and clerics.

Any guesses as to who is actually attacking the military bases?
 
Back
Top