Oh.... ClaireBear!?!

Mare

New Member
Time to protect polar bears from warming?

Group asks U.S. to list species as 'threatened'
Polar bears , seen in the Arctic Barents Sea region, have less sea ice on which to roam, a recent scientific study found. That study prompted a group to petition Wednesday for protected status.
Its move to the start of the Kyoto climate pact, a conservation group on Wednesday petitioned the Bush administration to list the polar bear as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act because its main habitat, sea ice, is shrinking as temperatures rise worldwide.

“The United States must quickly reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to a small fraction of current levels or polar bears will become extinct,” Kassie Siegel of the Center for Biological Diversity said in a statement announcing the petition.

The United States is the largest emitter of manmade emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases that many scientists tie to global warming. Nearly a quarter of all CO2 worldwide from burning fossil fuels originates in the United States.
 

ClaireBear

Banned
I know Mare... I've heard about this. Its actually quite terrible. All people are worried about is the impact the Kyoto Treaty will have on jobs...

Em... what about the Earth!!?!!

No doubt we'll have individuals refuting the claims that the States is the big bad boy in the CO2 but the sheer size of the continent (and preference for trucks and over size cars) must back up that statistic.. :shrug:
 

Professur

Well-Known Member
Anyone concerned about global warming would do well to pick up this month's issue of Scientific American. Seems we've now been the cause of global warming for the last 8000 years.
 

Winky

Well-Known Member
"The consequences of these surprising rises have been profound. Without them, current temperatures in northern parts of North America and Europe would be cooler by three to four degrees Celsius--enough to make agriculture difficult."

Well then I for one thank our farty ancestors for their sucessful terraforming efforts.
 

AlphaTroll

New Member
Gonz said:
You are aware we're killing them because they're black.

You sure it's not because they are black, lesbian, Jewish liberals who support the rights of women to receive safe, free abortion and advocate the writing off of third world debt? :p
 

jimpeel

Well-Known Member
Apparently, polar bears are not as endangered as the enviros would have us believe. They must be going apoplectic over this. Their main gun turret in the war against everything has been blown away.

Too bad this took seven years to get here.

SOURCE

Environment
Healthy polar bear count confounds doomsayers
paul waldie
WINNIPEG— From Thursday's Globe and Mail
Published Wednesday, Apr. 04, 2012 8:44PM EDT
Last updated Thursday, Apr. 05, 2012 5:05AM EDT

The debate about climate change and its impact on polar bears has intensified with the release of a survey that shows the bear population in a key part of northern Canada is far larger than many scientists thought, and might be growing.

The number of bears along the western shore of Hudson Bay, believed to be among the most threatened bear subpopulations, stands at 1,013 and could be even higher, according to the results of an aerial survey released Wednesday by the Government of Nunavut. That’s 66 per cent higher than estimates by other researchers who forecasted the numbers would fall to as low as 610 because of warming temperatures that melt ice faster and ruin bears’ ability to hunt. The Hudson Bay region, which straddles Nunavut and Manitoba, is critical because it’s considered a bellwether for how polar bears are doing elsewhere in the Arctic.

The study shows that “the bear population is not in crisis as people believed,” said Drikus Gissing, Nunavut’s director of wildlife management. “There is no doom and gloom.”

Mr. Gissing added that the government isn’t dismissing concerns about climate change, but he said Nunavut wants to base bear-management practices on current information “and not predictions about what might happen.”

The study’s conclusions drew concern from Andrew Derocher, a professor of biological sciences at the University of Alberta who has been studying polar-bear populations for years. Prof. Derocher said the 1,013 figure is derived from a range of 717 bears to 1,430. “It’s premature to draw many conclusions,” he said, adding that there were no comparative figures and the upper end of the range, 1,430, was highly unlikely.

Prof. Derocher also said some details in the survey pointed to a bear population in trouble. For example, the survey identified 50 cubs, which are usually less than 10 months old, and 22 yearlings, roughly 22 months old. That’s nearly one-third the number required for a healthy population, he said. “This is a clear indication that this population is not sustaining itself in any way, shape, or form.”

The debate over the polar-bear population has been raging for years, frequently pitting scientists against Inuit. In 2004, Environment Canada researchers concluded that the numbers in the region had dropped by 22 per cent since 1984, to 935. They also estimated that by 2011, the population would decrease to about 610. That sparked worldwide concern about the future of the bears and prompted the Canadian and American governments to introduce legislation to protect them.

But many Inuit communities said the researchers were wrong. They said the bear population was increasing and they cited reports from hunters who kept seeing more bears. Mr. Gissing said that encouraged the government to conduct the recent study, which involved 8,000 kilometres of aerial surveying last August along the coast and offshore islands.

Mr. Gissing said he hopes the results lead to more research and a better understanding of polar bears. He said the media in southern Canada has led people to believe polar bears are endangered. “They are not.” He added that there are about 25,000 polar bears across Canada’s Arctic. “That’s likely the highest [population level] there has ever been.”

There’s much at stake in the debate. Population figures are used to calculate quotas for hunting, a lucrative industry for many northern communities. Hunting polar bears is highly regulated but Inuit communities can sell their quota to sport hunters, who must hunt with Inuit guides. A polar-bear hunting trip can cost up to $50,000. Demand for polar-bear fur is also soaring in places like China and Russia and prices for some pelts have doubled in the past couple of years, reaching as high as $15,000.

The Nunavut hunting quota in the western Hudson Bay area fell to 8 from 56 after the 2004 report from Environment Canada. The Nunavut government increased it slightly last year but faced a storm of protest. Over all, about 450 polar bears are killed annually across Nunavut. Mr. Gissing said a new quota is expected to be announced in June.
 

2minkey

bootlicker
i will celebrate this polar bear news by clubbing some baby seals.

shit, surly apoplectic bears with mounted guns in turrets??? yes they will take over the world. no wonder they are successful.

my bet would be on the bear with the mounted 50 cal over the eskimo guy with his little rifle and snowmobile any day.

looks like the fuckin' pandas are arming themselves too.

Giant%20Panda%20Bear%20machine%20gun%20funny_w300_h300_cw300_ch300_thumb.jpg
 

Winky

Well-Known Member
I wonder what ever became of AlphaTroll
hawt young white women are a dying species in South Africa
 

2minkey

bootlicker
Pandas ... bah. I have no respect for any animal that won't fuck to save it's species

it is odd that the females are only receptive, what, like once a year for a few days or something like that? have to wonder what kind of adaptive advantage that is.

get them out of the zoos. place them in trailer parks where they will have an opportunity to learn about vigorous and frequent breeding through observation of the other animals. if they don't get on the ball, time for a BBQ.

abandoned-trailer-rape.jpg
 
Top