Porn star wannabes cry out...and then there was silence

[SouthernN'Proud]

Don't you think it's just plain rude and well, wrong to jack off in someone face without permission?

I can see it now...dorms become like smoking sections in restaurants..."Will that be semen acceptance or non-semen acceptance..."

 

[Professur]

Don't you think it's just plain rude and well, wrong to jack off in someone face without permission?

I most definitely do. The question, tho, isn't wether it's rude. It's just how much this new law can be stretched. We're already seeing kindergarden children getting charged for kissing. What new frontiers will this new law open up?

 

[tonksy]

I see your point but something needs to happen to these guys or there will seem to be no ramifications and then this will become a problem when other fucktard boys think they can get away with it.

 

[SouthernN'Proud]

Preschoolers whacking off on PapTarts maybe?

 

[Professur]

I see your point but something needs to happen to these guys or there will seem to be no ramifications and then this will become a problem when other fucktard boys think they can get away with it.

Tonks, the new law doesn't apply to them anyways. There are laws that they've already been charged under. Maybe add a line or two to strengthen them, but this is nuts.

 

[tonksy]

Your wife is walking into the store at dusk and some whacko leaps out and cums all over her chest and face. What do you want done?

 

[Professur]

I want his address. Nothing more.

 

[Slim Pickens]

I want his address. Nothing more.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Professur again.

 

[Gonz]

Jsut out of curiosity, if I get turned on by squirting honey on a chick's tits, and I do that to a woman while she's asleep, is that now sexual assault too? Or is that restricted to bodily fluids? Straight from the hose, or if I dribble out of a used condom?


The key word in all this is "sex". What they did was already illegal under the assault statutes. The only thing this changes, is to get the perp labelled as a sex offender too. Something I think we can all agree is becoming far, far to easy.

Someone who see's the light.

 

[Gonz]

.

Someone needed to be punished. Good for her for standing up for herself.

The three men, who no longer attend the university, were charged with disorderly conduct and public indecency

 

[simplyred]

.

That's no damn punishment Gonz! I think it's pre-rapist behavior. Cut their penis' off. THAT"s a punishment.

 

[Professur]

That's no damn punishment Gonz! I think it's pre-rapist behavior. Cut their penis' off. THAT"s a punishment.

I want his address. Nothing more.

I figure a ball-peen hammer should be just about right.

 

[BeardofPants]

So, vigilante justice is more acceptable to you than making it a felony to whack off over an unwilling participant?

 

[Gonz]

Personal justice assures consequences.

 

[Professur]

I could say that I didn't say any such thing, but my point is that these "children" damn well knew what they were doing was wrong, and all the laws in the world wouldn't have changed a damn thing. Sterner concequences might have.

In any personal case, however, vigilante justice is far more acceptable (to me) than sending these Darwinian failures to "sensitivity class" and wasting hundred of thousands of dollars holding their hands for the next 50 years. Frankly, I'm appalled that we're at this stage at all. In a functioning society, these punks families would have taken then out the the town square and leathered them until they damn well knew right from wrong. A year's indentured servitude to the victim and her family wouldn't go far wrong either.

 

[a13antichrist]

Jsut out of curiosity, if I get turned on by squirting honey on a chick's tits, and I do that to a woman while she's asleep, is that now sexual assault too? Or is that restricted to bodily fluids? Straight from the hose, or if I dribble out of a used condom?


The key word in all this is "sex". What they did was already illegal under the assault statutes. The only thing this changes, is to get the perp labelled as a sex offender too. Something I think we can all agree is becoming far, far to easy.

Just wait till we have to get signed consent forms before we can have sex.... and then watch them forget to have women require them from men too...

I'm fascinated to see Wink, Gonz & Prof all agreeing on this one. It's time that peasant-pleaser fucknut ideas like this law change were shoved into the apppropriate Senate orifices where they belong. If the fucking chick didn't even wake up, how could she possibly have felt defiled or disgraced? She never saw a penis, so she's suffering mental trauma now because of the THOUGHT that the stuff that was on her face same out of a penis? What sort of fucking moronic society rasies their daughters to be that fucking fragile? I'm not doubting she DOES feel violated, which is simply the proof of my point - making sex this big fucking life-ruling deal that fucks up your entire existence if you get it wrong is the biggest damn own-goal the human race could possibly score against itself. If someone comes on you you fucking well punch the guy in the face & wipe it off. If someone flashes his penis at you you tell him he has a small dick. I can see streakers being charged with sexual assault now if a nun gets a shock at the next football match... fucking morons. It's fucking boobs and cocks for fuck's sake, not poisonous snakes & nuclear bombs.