Yeah, and the feds should stay out of it, just like they should stay out of AZ's law making.
Of coarse I haven't heard if they are going to bring a law suit to try to say
Ca can't do prop19 for the same reason as in Az.
Don't know, but since prop19 fell there's no way to know now. It would have been interesting to watch the state vs federal control situation unfold. Now we won't get to see that, at least in California.
BTW, there were other states with the same initiatives on the ballots. I wonder how they fared. Since we didn't hear much about them I assume they also failed.
If AZ wants to secure it's borders there shouldn't be any problem. There is already Federal laws that support that. The problem lies in the wording and in the actions that are taken. It's a thin line to walk to stay within the jurisdiction of the State and not make laws that interfere with Federal laws.
For example, California can still refuse to provide assistance to Federal drug enforcement authorities. That would not interfere with Federal law, it would simply not assist with enforcing that law. There's a big difference. Drug raids and the like have always been the burden of the Feds. Without local assistance it makes the Feds' job much harder.