The Internet's "Red Light District"

Gato_Solo

Out-freaking-standing OTC member
flavio said:
Then if their name is already taken they would have to change it. Most likely ruining their business. Forcing countless legal businesses into ruin is not the right thing to do now is it?

They can't advertise before the name change? That's an extremely thin argument, flavio...extremely thin.
 

Professur

Well-Known Member
Gato_Solo said:
They can't advertise before the name change? That's an extremely thin argument, flavio...extremely thin.

C'mon. A guy won a million because his wife spilled coffee in her lap, and he wasn't getting any. You think this isn't enough?
 

Gato_Solo

Out-freaking-standing OTC member
Professur said:
C'mon. A guy won a million because his wife spilled coffee in her lap, and he wasn't getting any. You think this isn't enough?

You can't sue a private corporation working as an agent for a federal government or the UN unless the government allows it due to gross incompetence on the part of the company. In other words...they can't get sued.
 

Gato_Solo

Out-freaking-standing OTC member
Professur said:
You can't sue an agent, but you can sue a law. ACLU does it daily.

No. The ACLU challenges the constitutionality of the law. They lose as often as they win...
 

flavio

Banned
Gato_Solo said:
They can't advertise before the name change? That's an extremely thin argument, flavio...extremely thin.
Sure they caould advertise. Still has a huge potential to ruin the business or cost them a fortune. Not something you do to legal businesses.
 

HomeLAN

New Member
flavio said:
Sure they caould advertise. Still has a huge potential to ruin the business or cost them a fortune. Not something you do to legal businesses.

Really? Ever hear of eminent domain? Does the same damn thing to hundreds of small retail businesses (all legal!) every year.
 

Professur

Well-Known Member
Internet agency rejects '.xxx' domain name
By ANICK JESDANUN, AP Internet Writer




NEW YORK - Faced with opposition from conservative groups and some pornography Web sites, the Internet's key oversight agency voted Wednesday to reject a proposal to create a red-light district on the Internet.

The decision from the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers reverses its preliminary approval last June to create a ".xxx" domain name for voluntary use by the adult entertainment industry.

ICANN had postponed making a final decision in August after the U.S. government stepped in just days before a scheduled meeting to underscore objections it had received, an intervention that had led some ICANN critics to question the organization's independence.

"The board was certainly very conscious of that (the controversy) ... but the heart of the decision today was not driven by a political consideration," ICANN Chief Executive Paul Twomey said in an interview that followed more than an hour of discussion in a closed teleconference meeting.

Twomey said the decision largely came down to whether the creation of "xxx" might put ICANN in a difficult position of having to enforce all of the world's laws governing pornography, including ones that might require porn sites to use the domain. Speech-related laws, he noted, often conflict with one another.

He said concerns raised by various governments around the world did prompt the company proposing the domain, ICM Registry Inc. of Jupiter, Fla., to make changes in its bid, but the changes did not address all of the questions concerning enforcement.

ICANN's rejection of ".xxx" in a 9-5 vote ends, for now, a 6-year-old effort by ICM to establish a domain for the porn industry. ICANN first tabled its bid in 2000 out of fear it would be getting into content control.

ICM resubmitted its bid in 2004, this time structuring it with a policy-setting organization to free ICANN of that task. But the language of the proposed contract was vague, Twomey said, and a majority of the board felt that one interpretation could kick the task back to ICANN.

When the board initially voted last year to move forward with ".xxx," the contract details had yet to be written.

ICM argued the domain would help the $12 billion online porn industry clean up its act. Those using the domain would have to abide by yet-to-be-written rules designed to bar such trickery as spamming and malicious scripts.

Anti-porn advocates, however, countered that sites would be free to keep their current ".com" address, in effect making porn more easily accessible by creating yet another channel to house it.

And they say such a domain name would legitimize adults sites, which 2 in 5 Internet users visit each month, according to tracking by comScore Media Metrix.

Many porn sites also objected, fearing that such a domain would pave the way for governments -- the United States or repressive regimes abroad -- or even private industry to filter speech that is protected here under the First Amendment.

Democratic Sens. Max Baucus of Montana and Mark Pryor of Arkansas have introduced legislation that would create a mandatory ".xxx."

The porn industry trade group Free Speech Coalition believes a domain name for kids-friendly sites would be more appropriate.

Twomey said the board took the porn sites' concerns as a sign ICM did not fully represent the industry, a criteria required in the current round of domains.

Meanwhile, ICANN approved the creation of a domain name designed to help people manage their contact information online.

As envisioned, Internet users could buy a ".tel" name and set up a Web site with their latest digits -- home, cell and work phone numbers, home and work e-mail addresses, instant messaging handles and perhaps even a MySpace profile.

The ".tel" domain could appear in use as early as this year.

source
 

Altron

Well-Known Member
At this point, wouldn't it be less work to move all the non-porn sites over to their own domains?
 
Top