What is the bet that this is the last you hear of this story?

[jimpeel]

The Duke LaCrosse players were pilloried, slandered, convicted in the press, had petitions drawn against them by the professors of the school, and the national news press went bonkers for months. The school administration disbanded the team while declaring their guilt.

The issue was the alleged rape of a hooker, referred to by the press as an "exotic dancer", by the team which was found to be untrue; but the damage to the reputation of the team members was done. GUILTY on the front page innocent on page G22.

Now there is another even more shocking case out of Duke University and the national press gave the story one day. A real rape case. The professors are not drawing up petitions. The pillories stand empty. The university administrators remain silent.

This story is about a homosexual man who adopted two children with his partner. The child, like the hooker, is Black. Unlike the hooker, the child was raped and offered for sale to strangers to be raped again. Fortunately, the "rapist" was an undercover police officer.

So where is the outcry? Where are the news stories day after day on the progress of the case? Well, ya gotta tread carefully when you are referring to a homosexual who was allowed to adopt two young boys. Political correctness allowed homosexuals to adopt children and political correctness is gagging the press on this because they don't want to garner the animus of the Gay community.

Why homosexuals are allowed to adopt children of the sex which is the object of their affection is beyond me. Men should be barred from adopting boys and women should be disallowed the adoption of girls. That, by itself would take care of a lot of this crap.

SOURCE

Duke U. Official Caught in Alleged Child Sex Sting
Official Accused of Offering Adopted 5-Year-Old Son for Sex
By JACK DATE
June 26, 2009

A Duke University official has been charged in federal court with offering his 5-year-old adopted son up for sex. Frank Lombard, associate director of the Center for Health Policy, was arrested Wednesday in Raleigh, the FBI said.

An unidentified informant who already faces child porn charges in a different child sex case pointed investigators to Lombard, according to court documents. The informant told investigators he had met Lombard on the Internet four years ago. The informant described in graphic detail how he allegedly observed Lombard molesting an African-American child on four occasions over an Internet video chat service called ICUii.

The informant said, according to court papers, that Lombard, who is white, said that he lived in the Raleigh-Durham area of North Carolina and that the child was one of two adopted African-Americans in his custody.

Lombard has been charged with attempting to induce someone to cross state lines to engage in sex with a child, punishable by a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

Lombard allegedly used the adult Internet service to conduct his video chats. According to an affidavit in support of the arrest warrant, the Internet service indicated that Lombard's profile "stated he was interested in "perv fam fun," a reference to "incestuous child molestation." The service also told investigators that a customer service complaint had been sent to the company in January 2007. A customer who had chatted with Lombard complained to the company that Lombard said he was "into incest" and had adopted two African-American children, court records said.

A Washington, D.C., police detective who was investigating the case set up undercover chats with someone matching Lombard's description during which the detective says he was invited to fly to Raleigh to have sex with the person's 5- year-old adopted child. In his affidavit, Det. Timothy Palchak wrote that he engaged in a chat with someone using the screen name "FL" who provided nude pictures of himself. The pictures matched Lombard's North Carolina driver's license photo, according to the affidavit.

During the chats, according to the affidavit, "FL" told undercover investigators that he had himself molested his child, whom he adopted as an infant, and that he had allowed others to molest his child. "FL" stated that "the abuse of the child was easier when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening, but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the molestation," Palchak wrote in his affidavit.

Two children were taken from Lombard's home and put into protective custody by the North Carolina Department of Social Services, an FBI statement said.

Michael Schoenfeld, a Duke University spokesman, told ABC News that Lombard has been placed on unpaid leave and that the university is cooperating fully with the investigation. Lombard has been employed by Duke since 1999, Schoenfeld said.

Appearing today in federal court in Durham, Lombard agreed to be transferred to Washington for a later court hearing. His lawyer did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

 

[spike]

Jim, that's pretty fucked up shit for you to say. First of all this guy has been charged, not convicted and I swear I remember you making a big deal about the difference between those two with the mormon child molesters.

2nd, if the guy is guilty it in no way reflects on homosexual parents anymore than a heterosexual child rapist reflects on heterosexuals.

Why homosexuals are allowed to adopt children of the sex which is the object of their affection is beyond me

Bullshit, go ahead and outlaw heterosexuals from adopting children of the sex which is the object of their desire too.

Damn Jim, really went weird there.

 

[Winky]

No, really?

 

[Frank Probity]

The reason the Duke University case got so much publicity was because the prosecutor was running for re-election as Durham County Prosecutor. There were serious questions about the veracity of the victim and the prosecutor was hard pressed to provide solid evidence against the accused Duke Lacrosse players alleged to have committed the rape. As the case progressed, more and more suspicions arose concerning the guilt or innocence of the accused. Meantime, the media was spoon fed information in an effort, not necessarily to address the highly publicized case, but to enhance name recognition of the prosecutor who was engaged in a highly financed primary election challenge.

Add in the fact Duke University is one of the more prestigious universities in the U.S., with graduates in every conceivable position and authority, the criminal investigation drew national attention.

Since the homosexual parent of the five year old lad is an employee of the research department of Duke University, and there is more than enough evidence to proceed directly to criminal charges, the case is stagnant until it comes to trial.

Is the purpose of jimpeel to make an issue of this because the adoptive parent is a homosexual? Or is jimpeel outraged over the full extent of the seriousness of this issue. And if that be the case, then why does jimpeel not raise an uproar over every deviate in the country who sells their youngster, rapes their step children or uses them as sex slaves for personal or friends use. This should not be an issue specifically of a homosexual but an issue of deviant behavior that takes place every day by heterosexuals who do just as bad if not worse things to kids as Frank Lombard.

Now, the politics and the Duke case are over, the prosecutor was charged, found guilty, sentenced (although not heavily enough), and is currently involved in civil legal actions that will, hopefully, leave him destitute.

Meantime ex-prosecutor Mike Nifong ruined the reputation of three young men via a breach of the judicial system. But should we condemn the entire judicial system for one over zealous prosecutor and his political ambitions?

No more than we should condemn all homosexuals who adopt children based on one homosexual who allegedly did what heterosexuals have done before him and will continue to do until enough outrage is cast over their misdeeds as some feel should be cast over a homosexual parent.

 

[Gonz]

The reason the Duke University case got so much publicity was because the prosecutor was running for re-election as Durham County Prosecutor.

Which explains Durham Co. What about the other 3140 counties?

raise an uproar over every deviate in the country who sells their youngster, rapes their step children or uses them as sex slaves for personal or friends use.

OK. Bring them forth. You'll find equal outrage at any deviate rapist.

However, is it not worthy of discussion to examine the fact that those who may not, by choice, whether that choice is nurture and/or nature, have children, chose to adopt children? Do they, as a group, wish to have new toys? Have (sex) slaves? Enhance their agenda? Attempt to be more "normal"? If they really wish a family, I'm sure they could find a young woman & make the commitment that a family requires. (reverse the sexual identities those of you who wish to be politically correct)

Homosexuals, adopting older children can be a help to society. Adopting infants ( or the very young) never.

 

[Winky]

homophobe

 

[Gonz]

I feel the same way about most parental units. The difference is, they can get one by orgasm, not lawyers

 

[Frodo]

The real outrage is this:

punishable by a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

I bet he gets a lot less. The courts tend to put these guys right back out there until someone finds a child's head in the corn field.

 

[spike]

However, is it not worthy of discussion to examine the fact that those who may not, by choice, whether that choice is nurture and/or nature, have children, chose to adopt children?

Same as any sterile couple.

Do they, as a group, wish to have new toys? Have (sex) slaves? Enhance their agenda? Attempt to be more "normal"?

Same as any sterile couple wishes to have new toys, have sex slaves, enhance their agenda, or attempts to be normal.

If they really wish a family, I'm sure they could find a young woman & make the commitment that a family requires

Sure, just like you could find a man and make a commitment to him. Do it Gonz, show everyone how easy it is to establish a life with someone you're not attracted to.

Homosexuals, adopting older children can be a help to society. Adopting infants ( or the very young) never.

You're completely wrong.

 

[Gonz]

I feel the same way about most parental units. The difference is, they can get one by orgasm, not lawyers

Looks like spike overlooked this.

Why would I want to establish a relationship with someone that doesn't want the same things as I? Don't want kids? Want too many kids? Let's part ways.

 

[spike]

Right, why would they want to establish a relationship with someone that doesn't want the same things as them.

 

[Gonz]

A non-child-bearing relationship IS a commonality of homosexual unions.

 

[spike]

Yep, it's a commonality of sterile unions too. That's why they adopt. I bet people who can bear children tend to adopt less.

 

[jimpeel]

The fact is that it is politically incorrect to go after a member of a politically charged voting group with a strong leadership and following.

The Duke players did not fit this profile so they were fair game.

Both victims were black but one was allegedly assaulted by White heterosexuals while the other was allegedly assaulted by a White homosexual pedophile.

All things equal other than the sexual preference of the perpetrators.

An actual rape did take place in the one case; and a contrived rape was not committed in the other.

One garnered wall to wall coverage. The other has garnered very little attention.

One spurred the faculty to draw a petition against the "perpetrators". The other has brought nothing but silence from those same faculty members.

One garnered open hostility and derision from the school administration. The other has garnered deafening silence.

This nation will not fall by foreign invasion, internal strife, or revolution. This country will fall because of the creeping incrementalism of political correctness.

 

[spike]

The fact is that it is politically incorrect to go after a member of a politically charged voting group with a strong leadership and following.

No, actually it's not.

An actual rape did take place in the one case; and a contrived rape was not committed in the other.

So you've convicted the guy before trial? That would be highly hypocritical considering your previous postings.

One garnered wall to wall coverage. The other has garnered very little attention.

Actually both have got a fair bit of coverage.

One spurred the faculty to draw a petition against the "perpetrators". The other has brought nothing but silence from those same faculty members.

Proof of silence from the same faculty members? Where?

This nation will not fall by foreign invasion, internal strife, or revolution. This country will fall because of the creeping incrementalism of political correctness.

 

[jimpeel]

Proof of silence from the same faculty members? Where?

Great example of asking someone to prove the negative. "Show me their silence and what, exactly, they didn't say and when they didn't say it."

Ah, the laughs they just keep comin' around here.

 

[spike]

You made an allegation you apparently can't back up. Are we supposed to take your word that the same faculty members have been completely silent? Considering how many times you've been utterly wrong in the past I'd like something to support your claims.

Also you neglected to address my other points. I'd really like to hear your answer on this one..

"So you've convicted the guy before trial? That would be highly hypocritical considering your previous postings."

Remember the mormons? Want me to get some quotes from that thread?

 

[Gonz]

Actually both have got a fair bit of coverage.

hmmm, if it weren't for Jim, I'd not have heard about this.

 

[spike]

I wouldn't have heard about the lacrosse shit if it weren't for this forum. Interesting.

 

[Gonz]