Search results

Still here.

I was refering to you saying they were long gone.

ohhh why do I loath a13 so much?

Texas 41 USC 38. UCS loses. Matt, go fnd a job ya hippie. Wankers. College football is over.....thank God.

Wrong Winks. Let me, being a formar tanker, tell you about what it's really like aye? Do this. Tell me what it feels like to have a Warthog screaming in on your tank column at antenna level while your trying to pull the hatches closed on your tank before the guy screams over the top of...

White Phosphorus (WP) - GlobalSecurity.org It's used to create a smoke screen. It is not an incendiary device that is used to blow something up. Gato pretty much nailed this one down. The Army does not use or even has any rounds in which WP is used for the purpose of killing. Ever see a...

It just dawned on me. When you see these high profile cases of bad cop beating the life outta innocent civilian on TV where does it usually happen? California... With the exception of the beligerant id10t's in Loiusiana that is (hit him at least three times just to make sure...oh, and do it...

Thank you for a thinker. The law was not created to protect the police. It was created to protect the innocent. If a person commits a crime that involves a police officer and a false claim, and is backed with evidence, then hey, more power to the cop. Then again, if the reverse if true, good bye...

But, if it's not in the legal documentation, i.e. legal law, that would otherwise incriminate of a person paying that genious's paycheck then it's basically ok. Thus, the judge rightly sighted here. If legal precedent is set what stops other states from adopting these measures? Obviously IT'S...

So, at least in the states of California and Louisiana this isn't applicable then? :lol2:

So, what eactly is going to be tested here. If any males are involved then I really, really, really, don't want to know a single itty bitty thing. Butttt if woman are involved, hey divulge by all means. :D

Exactly. Can't go wrong with an honest cop. :rolleyes:

One pair, two pair, three fucking pair. Who care's? Just tell him how to wire the damn thing someone please. :banghead:

Sorry snp. I've bout had it with probation occifers and powice wannabe's this past year and half. Pretty fucking tired of the BS.

Gestapo tactics are ok then? Is this what you are saying? Come on dude...who funds yer paycheck man? Like I said, I have no problem with the law in the understanding, but who are we protecting here? The enforcers or the enforced? Yeah, ya got a job to keep but I'm sure there is enough...

Interesting. But then again, since you work in the correctional field I'm going to bet that this really chaps yer ass hard. Get with it man. If the cops are protected by law to NOT be charged against filling a false report/claim, then why in the hell should a person who is paying that...

No I wasn’t. A person has to first have a clue about ISDN to confuse it.

One pair? Wait a sec. I thought DSL used the other pair?

Thus we should be biased towards cops? It works both ways. You know, one of the things I try to teach my kids is that it's a two way street. They have to come out to. It's not a one way street for them, rather a two way street for both of us. We both have to work on it. I see an analogy...

Looks pretty cut and dry to me. Seems that is was a one way ruling that was overturned and rightly so. The police could just as easily lodge false statements, which they probably do already, so why can't the person who is paying their wages do the same?