don't you mean " compaaaaarrrrrrrrred"Dave said:how was it compared to the first?

About as good. Ending leaves you hanging, of course. Effects are excellent once again.Dave said:how was it compared to the first?
No lass, it's PG-13, but that don't sound very piratey now, do it?tonksy said:Is it AAAARRRR rated?
chcr said:About as good. Ending leaves you hanging, of course. Effects are excellent once again.
Gonz said:#3 is already on the books.
kNightlyWinky said:So is Keira still worth a shag?

The humour was still prevalent ,but the CGI was over used,its like they paid to have CGI characters developed and then had to validate the expenditure by using it in scene after scene after scene after scene
.They could have easily knocked off a half hour running time (or more)by not repeatedly similar scenes using the same character.I paid to see a movie ,but instead was only shown a "part" of a movie with no conclusions what so ever ,whatever happened to a Movie that stands on its own instead of being only a segment.
I've used Fandango...the first two shows sold out and having to wait until after 10pm to get in
A.B.Normal said:Actually its in the can,they shot 2 and 3 simutaneously,since its pretty hard to get all the actor's schedules to jibe and they probably were worried that Keith would be around for much longer(good call there).Release date for P3 is May 2007.
chcr said:I've used Fandango...
"My happiness is a golden poem."