ris quoted PT & it makes for an interesting thread.
Look at the last 100 years alone. Telephones, television, radio, aeronautics, space travel, automobiles, medicine, just to name a few that have gone from non-existant or barely existant to commonplace.
Unfortunately, there has been a very dark side too.
Homicides in 1900 were about 3 per 100,000 population. In 1996 it was over 10 per.
Out of wedlock births (I couldn't get a solid number before) 1970 was around 10%. In 1998 it was 31%.
Prison populations have risen: 1930 100 prisoners per 100,000 population to over 350 per.
Somebody today was saying in WWI, when the recruits used typical bullseyes for practice, the "first time kill" on the battlefield was 30%. Psyops got involved & added the human silhouette for the recruits of WWII. The battlefield figure jumped from 30% to 60%. BTW, guess who invented "video games".
While we've advanced scientifically, we've regressed socially. With all the problems they had "back then" maybe butting into the neighbors business wasn't such a bad thing?
Who is to say what is best for the world, is what we believe automatically the way everyone should believe? That's pretty arrogant.
Look at the last 100 years alone. Telephones, television, radio, aeronautics, space travel, automobiles, medicine, just to name a few that have gone from non-existant or barely existant to commonplace.
Unfortunately, there has been a very dark side too.
Homicides in 1900 were about 3 per 100,000 population. In 1996 it was over 10 per.
Out of wedlock births (I couldn't get a solid number before) 1970 was around 10%. In 1998 it was 31%.
Prison populations have risen: 1930 100 prisoners per 100,000 population to over 350 per.
Somebody today was saying in WWI, when the recruits used typical bullseyes for practice, the "first time kill" on the battlefield was 30%. Psyops got involved & added the human silhouette for the recruits of WWII. The battlefield figure jumped from 30% to 60%. BTW, guess who invented "video games".
While we've advanced scientifically, we've regressed socially. With all the problems they had "back then" maybe butting into the neighbors business wasn't such a bad thing?

), but the general consensus has long been that the evils of technology far outweigh the bad - because in the end, the evils of technology are not inherent, but rely on human nature to exploit them. The problem lies in making this technology available to those with the inclinatin to misuse it. Or, more fundamentally, our retardness in raising such people. 