spike
New Member
I'm glad you agree that some things just cannot be preempted.
We don't need rights taken away from everybody because of a few.
It has to be a case by case basis.
So, your comment has nothing to do with this thread.
Just more retoric. As usual.
No your comment had nothing to do with the discussion. Gonz said the examples of stopping intended violence were thought police. I pointed out that they weren't and you inexplicable made a comment that they had not stopped this shooters intended violence. Which was irrelevant to the thread.
We hadn't been talking about taking away rights. So just more rhetoric from you. As usual.