As we slip further down the slope

Professur

Professur

Well-Known Member
Suprise at spelling snafu sanctions
University lecturer waves through wonky wordage
By Sarah Bee → More by this author
Published Thursday 7th August 2008 13:44 GMT

Proof that the revised maxim "If you can't beat 'em, fuck it all off and have some pie" is increasingly the norm reaches us today, as a senior university lecturer throws his hands aloft and declares a spelling amnesty. According to the Times, Dr Ken Smith of Buckinghamshire New University* suggests a list of 20 common mistakes should be waved through as 'variants'.

Smith is ostensibly voicing a plea for some logic to be applied to the notoriously mercurial English spelling system, but seems chiefly concerned with saving time and reducing hair-tearing for tutors beleaguered by constant balls-ups from students. The criminology lecturer, writing in the Times Higher Education mag, said: "Teaching a large first-year course at a British university, I am fed up with correcting my students' atrocious spelling. Aren't we all?
Click here to find out more!

"But why must we suffer? Instead of complaining about the state of the education system as we correct the same mistakes year after year, I've got a better idea."

His dastardly plot is to loosen things up for 20 commonly-misspelt English words and allow alternative spellings such as "truely", "wierd" and "speach". The Times also informs us, as we peer at it through our trembling fingers, that Smith proposes the "their/thier" issue should be resolved by simplification.

"Why not just drop the word their altogether in favour of there?" he asks, as horns no doubt sprout from his brow. "It does not make any difference to the meaning of a sentence if you spell 'their' as 'thier' or 'there', so why insist on 'their'?" (All very well, Dr Smith, but where does that leave "they're", eh? Where?)

In a move guaranteed to perturb some Reg commenters**, Dr Smith also put forward the idea that we shouldn't fuss overmuch about the difference between "queue", "cue" and "Kew".

Naturally Smith's proposals will see a renewal of the huffings and puffings over school literacy standards. We at the Reg can only concur that education is lacking, but would suggest Dr Smith shelve his craven appeasement plans and consider introducing corporal punishment for his mother-tongue-mangling studes. Clearly, it's the only language they understand. ®
Bootnotes

* Buckingham New University runs a site about higher education for 11-16 year-olds called Be Coz U Can. An excellent start.
Click to expand...

Source
 
If a student gives me something with spelling errors I just penalize them. Then they come and tell me that the contents are alright but their spelling is wrong, to which I reply that in written language what they said is wrong therefore making the content wrong.
 
Luis G said:
If a student gives me something with spelling errors I just penalize them. Then they come and tell me that the contents are alright but their spelling is wrong, to which I reply that in written language what they said is wrong therefore making the content wrong.
Click to expand...

It's good that you're trying to enforce proper language but at the level you're teaching it is not going to be nearly as effective as if it's pushed in elementary school.
 
I had a physics professor who would often quote: "The most powerful scientific tool available to man is the English language. Learn to use it with precision!!" :trippin:
 
It's funny that a physics professor would say that, given that precision is how close your results are to each other, while accuracy is how close your results are to being correct.

As for the topic at hand... the other time this was posted, I said that an easy way to piss me off is not so much bad spelling, but being told that I should "deal with it."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top