Chevy Volt and Nissan Leaf ...

is there any meaning behind this jim? or are you just an eager beaver with the exciting and profound revelation that cars that don't go very far aren't popular in america?
 
Just wait until you hear his reiterations about inventing more
vehicles that don't go very far in his State of the Re-election speech
 
Chevy Volt the car GM management cancelled.

It runs off the gasoline engine after the battery runs down.

yeah that's right it will go about 35 miles to a charge
but the total driving range is up to 375 miles

So you get to pay all that extra initial purchase cost for what?

The fricken thing costs forty grand?
 
ummmm i doubt he'll talk about stuff the corporate orifice would find so obviously laughable...

but if he does, well... i guess i wouldn't be that surprised.

wait how did he invent those vehicles? wasn't the VOLT a jerk-off baby of lutz?
 
Chevy Volt the car GM management cancelled.

I guess you can't be faulted for not knowing recent history.
 
I guess I can be faulted for you not knowing recent history?

ummm no because you can't back up your statement. you cannot authoritatively show that the government forced GM to make the volt. that's just what you think happened based on shit you've perused in fringe-nutcase intarweb conjecture.

i can tell you from real experience that GM needs absolutely no help in making shitty, unprofitable decisions.

please, try to make assertions of specific facts and back them up.

oh, right....
 
Go on with your bad self there buddy

your version of reality is working out just fine!
 
yes its all about me

So the government/union owned car company is making all the right decisions?

At every turn they are out performing Ford in this arena?
 
and now you are introducing an incomparable case. ford was in a different position going into all of this, perhaps by virtue of the fact that they are not quite the holding company that happens to build cars that GM is. try shifting from ideological to descriptive and analytical discourse.

if possible.

apparently not.
 
oh I'm sorry I missed the part where you were singing the praises
of the 94 MPG Chevy Volt
 
right.... it was a piece of shit from day one. how's that?

you got anything to say or are you just gonna continue to spin into irrelevant directions?
 
revolting teabaggers

spin right round like a record

ok we've another year of the Osambo regime and then we can forget about it?

oh noe's wait we'll have to live with the five trillion (more before he's done)
dollars of debt he added and his crowning achievement, socialized healthcare.

doubtlessly the Romney administration isn't going to do anything but continue the
race to the ruination of our once proud nation.

So are you still a social liberal that believes in conservative fiscal policy?

You don't care if the babies are all born out of wedlock, fags traipse around the battlespace
and any other form of decadent sexual abnormalities and deviant behavior is held up
to be the new norm, while at the same time a command and control economy is considered
to be fiscally conservative?

Me i'm gonna party like its 2012
zxprfo.jpg
 
you're soooo caught up the moralizing aren't you? makes me suspect you regret fucking her runny.

you have a million complaints but nothing realistically prescriptive. (sorry, but "free up the market" is fucking obvious.)
 
well then if its so fuckin' obvious

from the PhD's all the way down to the plumbers and the truck drivers
then when the hell is it going to happen?

oh I know...

2h7jviv.jpg
 
what do you think the message is behind that silly cartoon you posted?

sounds like a wussy little union guy who never left toledo. plus obviously i had to throw in some kind of gay reference because you love gays so much.

hey man if you think it's cool to be a commie and blaspheme against capitalism, you just keep at it...
 
Back
Top