that it'd be ridiculous to base policy off of what Zawahiri says or pay any attention to it all.
Substitute the name binLaden & you've destroyed your own argument against this war.
that it'd be ridiculous to base policy off of what Zawahiri says or pay any attention to it all.
Substitute the name binLaden & you've destroyed your own argument against this war.
Well, I was against the whole business from the beginning because even looking at the trumped up evidence, they were clearly no threat to us. The post 9/11 paranoia overcame clear thinking, IMO. Overwhelming force, as I have said time and again, was the only way it might have worked and probably still is but we wouldn't do it then and we won't do it now. Cultural understanding between two dudes that meet on the street is a lot different than that between nations and I suspect you know it.
Question though, what would you do if you were in Iraq and came upon a man brutally beating a woman?
Ask the man why she's getting beaten. Thats the only answer I can think of off the top of my head.
Al-qaeda could not care less whether we "win" or "lose" in Iraq, as far as their goals, they've already won.
The "dems" couldn't care less whether we "win or "lose" in Iraq, they just want to get elected, which getting out will likely guarantee.
I couldn't care less whether we "win" or "lose" in Iraq, I just want the bleeding to stop. Getting out is the fastest, most efficient way to make that happen.
The simple fact is that there is no sane way to really win in Iraq. Genocide will work, nothing short of that has a chance.
Some nebulous defintion of victory or loss in Iraq is completely meaningless to the American people in general and to the nation's security.
Besides, the administration declared victory years ago. We already won.
Easy questions, easy answers.
A Baghdad plea: U.S. should stay and fight
BAGHDAD - A majority of Iraqi lawmakers endorsed a draft bill calling for a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops and demanding a freeze on the number already in the country, lawmakers said Thursday.
The proposed Iraqi legislation, drafted by the parliamentary bloc loyal to anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr...
Ali al-Adeeb, a senior Shiite lawmaker and an aide to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, questioned the wisdom of asking foreign forces to leave when Iraqi forces were not ready to take full responsibility for security in the country...
Al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia, which launched two uprisings against U.S. troops in 2004, has been blamed in much of the recent sectarian violence against Sunnis and has been one of the main targets of a U.S.-Iraqi security crackdown.
Last month, the cleric ordered his six Cabinet ministers to leave the government after the Shiite prime minister refused to put a timetable for foreign troops withdrawal.
Muqtada al-Sadr
Your opinions are influenced by what alQaeda, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, ABC, NBC, CBS, NY TIMES, LA TIMES, USA TODAY, NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE, TIME MAGAZINE
You probably don't care, but I take anything any of those say with a grain of salt as a general rule. It's unwise to take what proven liar says at face value. That they occasionally draw similar conclusions simply proves that they're smarter than they seem.
I do notice that conservatives in general and you in particular base a lot of your comments directly on what al-Qaeda (they're the enemy, why do you believe them?) say in the media.
Oops.
Worried Congress' support for Iraq is deteriorating rapidly, Baghdad dispatched senior officials to Capitol Hill this week to warn members one-on-one that pulling out U.S. troops would have disastrous consequences.
Worried Congress' support for Iraq is deteriorating rapidly, Baghdad dispatched senior officials to Capitol Hill this week to warn members one-on-one that pulling out U.S. troops would have disastrous consequences.
anything is "evidence," eh?
Disastrous compared to what?
It's their country---shouldn't they be the authority on what they think could happen to it??
Could be worse:
If we left Iraq Iran would take over the country. They would be closer geographically to fullfill their wish of seeing Israel erased off the map.
They would launch on Israel, who would respond with WMDs of their own, nuking Baghdad and killing millions. Pakistan responds against Israel with their own nuclear ballistic missiles, killing millions. The United States counterstrike takes out Pakistan, killing millions.
Inside of a week after Americans withdraw, there will be nearly one billion people killed in the ME. Due to radiation levels it will not be safe to venture there for at least a thousand years and oil production as we know it will cease to exist in the middle east. The whole world, what little is left of it, descends into an energy crisis and a nuclear winter, killing millions more.