Evils of socialized medicine

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
It's cheap (or free) but is it safe?

Paul Harvey did a story on a guy from New Zealand who, with gangrene in his fingers & after waiting over a year on the "urgent surgery" list, got so fed up with the pain he took a pair of kitchen shears & cut them off.

Is it worth free/cheap to not have (relatively) immediate access to hospitals?
 
NO NO NO NO NO!!!

This is the WORST thing about Canada. Public medicare sounds great on paper if you are a leftie, but it does not work! Ontario is draining billions and billions of dollars into public healthcare and it is NEVER enough.

Nurses everywhere are carrying signs "Your tax cuts at work".

There is not enough beds in the hospitals for everyone. Ambulances can't function because they can't get the people out of the ambulance into the hospital.

The ER has a long line. Sort of take a number and wait your turn. Why? Because every moron with a cold/flu has to go to the ER for treatment. Why? Because it is hard as hell to find a doctor. Why? Because doctors can only take a certain number of patients. Why? Because the government tells them to.

There are only two countries in the world where you cannot go see a doctor and pay cash for medical assistance. North Korea and Canada.

We still don't have a family doctor. No doctor wants new patients. Therefore, in the rare cases we get ill, we go to the ER. Sick.

Health care covers most things in Canada, except medicine. So if you have a chronic disease, you are sol.

I hate this fucking system. People DIE in the ER because they can't get treatment. Some places in Toronto have a 5 hour line.

Meanwhile, dentists and optometrists flourish. Every place you go to there are dentists. They are clean and neat, unlike most doctor's offices I've seen.

If I ever need medical assistance on a serious level, I go SOUTH! To the USA! Canada lacks behind most third world countries with this system they have.

If I have money, I want to be able to pay for IMMEDIATE and BETTER service. Moreover, I don't want to pay for all the smokers in Canada get surgery to remove their lungs. :mad2:

Public healthcare: It does not work.

(BTW you know there HAS to be something wrong if newspapers run articles for months at a time "Why Public Healthcare is a Good Thing", and compare Canada with all major countries in the world, saying at least we are not as bad as countryX.)

(BTW2, my mom is a registered nurse in Ontario. She worked in SEVERAL countries as a nurse, and of all of then Ontario is the worst.)
 
we have that, only workers that pay for it have the right to medical attention (anyway, by law it must be paid by the employer).

it really works for people that have not enough resources.
 
it appears public healthcare in canada does not work all that good.

i don't see the 'evil' in public healthcare, it might have problems but they are not malicious or deliberately intended to harm people so i have a hard time with the term 'evil'.
 
Public health care in general does not work because:

+ People can consult a doctor whenever they want to, because they don't pay. They go see the doctor for the teeniest of pains, aches, and coughs. This drives costs up.

+ Making private hospitals illegal discourages improvement. Bring in the competition and you will see the quality of service will go up, and the costs will go down.

+ I do not want to pay for the health care of some smug I don't know. I will pay for my own and for my families. Its called health insurance, just like you buy car insurance. If you can't afford health insurance, tough. There can be charities where you can go to that will help you out, but I won't. Sorry, but I have better things to spend my money on. It isn't the government's job to redistribute the wealth.

+ If I have the money and offer to pay extras, I want to jump the line up to a certain point (where it is life/death situations). Of course, with private hospitals there ain't likely to be a long line. I heard in Britain there are lines of up to 3+ years for some operations.

+ I do, however, support a little public health care. People that are being trained and don't hold qualifications yet must complete years of physical training. These are done under the supervision of a fully trained and certified doctor. Since these are in some cases government regulated, you could let the government fund these, and people without health care can go to these types of hospitals where they know they will be operated on by untrained people (under the supervision of a fully trained person though). Hm, this is just an idea, but I haven't really thought that much about it.

Now, people, please tell me the wonderful advantages of state run health care. And please don't tell me that "everyone" gets health care for free, because that is a disadvantage. Remember the Simpsons episode? Homer step in front of a truck because of "free health care"? Same principle.
 
LastLegionary said:
Public health care in general does not work because:

+ People can consult a doctor whenever they want to, because they don't pay. They go see the doctor for the teeniest of pains, aches, and coughs. This drives costs up.

very true, educate people as to when they should see the doctor, especailly for colds where the doctor can do nothing to help.
sometimes seeing the doctor for the tiny ache or pain can save lives, though, especially with diseases like meningitis that act fast and look like a cold.

+ Making private hospitals illegal discourages improvement. Bring in the competition and you will see the quality of service will go up, and the costs will go down.

i don't know a country where this is done. its not done here, or in frnace or germany to my knowledge. also, just because public health care is there does not automatically mean that private is banned, therefore irrelevant.
competition is good, but could possibly encourage business practices that may not be compatible with patient care.

+ I do not want to pay for the health care of some smug I don't know. I will pay for my own and for my families. Its called health insurance, just like you buy car insurance. If you can't afford health insurance, tough. There can be charities where you can go to that will help you out, but I won't. Sorry, but I have better things to spend my money on. It isn't the government's job to redistribute the wealth.

is that the same for education? are you willing to pay for someone elses education or leave us all to get on with it? some see the right to quality health for all can be as a basic part of the governments provsision, as education and defence are.
some can't afford cars, therefore don't need insurance, but i'm stuck with my body.

+ If I have the money and offer to pay extras, I want to jump the line up to a certain point (where it is life/death situations). Of course, with private hospitals there ain't likely to be a long line. I heard in Britain there are lines of up to 3+ years for some operations.

and here you can do just that, go private if you want [our private healthcare is sooo cheap btw :)] i put down most of our waiting lists to bad management and lack of investment in the past.

+ I do, however, support a little public health care. People that are being trained and don't hold qualifications yet must complete years of physical training. These are done under the supervision of a fully trained and certified doctor. Since these are in some cases government regulated, you could let the government fund these, and people without health care can go to these types of hospitals where they know they will be operated on by untrained people (under the supervision of a fully trained person though). Hm, this is just an idea, but I haven't really thought that much about it.

poverty = substandard healthcare. i don't see why this need be the case.

Now, people, please tell me the wonderful advantages of state run health care. And please don't tell me that "everyone" gets health care for free, because that is a disadvantage. Remember the Simpsons episode? Homer step in front of a truck because of "free health care"? Same principle.

we do that all the time here, diving under buses, getting ill just to use those taxes. i guess you'd have to be a real selfish cynic to do that.
 
is that the same for education? are you willing to pay for someone elses education or leave us all to get on with it? some see the right to quality health for all can be as a basic part of the governments provsision, as education and defence are.
some can't afford cars, therefore don't need insurance, but i'm stuck with my body.

Yes it is. It isn't the government's job to educate the people.
 
i don't know a country where this is done. its not done here, or in frnace or germany to my knowledge. also, just because public health care is there does not automatically mean that private is banned, therefore irrelevant.
competition is good, but could possibly encourage business practices that may not be compatible with patient care.

Like what? Go to the competition if you don't like the way some company handles medical treatment. Or to your favorite government-run hospital if you insist on having a public healthcare
 
if business is out to make profit then the amount of time patients spend in hospital, use drugs, [etc] can impact on the profits of the company. the problems could therefore be that patient needs may [and it is a may] be in opposition to business requirements.

when i earn enough i will take private health insurance [as a consequence my tax payment reduces too, which is good], for the occaisions when i need fast health care, and it also covers my asthma medicine payments.

as i said, i have no cause to doubt the nhs here, but i am also aware of the current problems it has. private health care is so cheap here it's worth having jsut for peace of mind.
 
I dunno, I like that our kids have their own doctor, not some emerg. guy. I like that in the beginning, when we were just starting out and, looking back, real poor, we could go to our own doctor without having to pay. That we didn't have to delay taking them because of money. That's gotta be a horrible situation for parents elsewhere.

My personal experience - I've lived in several areas of Ontario, moved several times, and have never had to search for a doctor. We've never gone without one.

Between hubby, my children and myself, we've had surgeries, both emergency and elective, and have never had to wait on a list.

Hubby had a temporary serious illness about 3 years back, was admitted right away, and got the best of care.

I have a chronic serious illness, and getting timely treatment or testing has never been a problem.

All in all, it's worked for me and my family, and we've been on the low and middle sides of the income spectrum. I put this crap going on here now down to bad management, as ris suggested.[edit]and UNIONS and newspapers out for a story and bleeding heart bandwagon jumpers on.[/edit]
 
LastLegionary said:
It isn't the government's job to educate the people.

It's not the federal governments job but it is in many states constitutions to provide free, uniform education.
 
LastLegionary said:
+ People can consult a doctor whenever they want to, because they don't pay. They go see the doctor for the teeniest of pains, aches, and coughs. This drives costs up.

Sure, they are paying for it.

LastLegionary said:
+ Making private hospitals illegal discourages improvement. Bring in the competition and you will see the quality of service will go up, and the costs will go down.

Who said that having public health care makes illegal private hospitals?

LastLegionary said:
+ I do not want to pay for the health care of some smug I don't know. I will pay for my own and for my families. Its called health insurance, just like you buy car insurance. If you can't afford health insurance, tough. There can be charities where you can go to that will help you out, but I won't. Sorry, but I have better things to spend my money on. It isn't the government's job to redistribute the wealth.

of course not, you're paying your own health care, other people that make use of it are also paying for it.

LastLegionary said:
+ If I have the money and offer to pay extras, I want to jump the line up to a certain point (where it is life/death situations). Of course, with private hospitals there ain't likely to be a long line. I heard in Britain there are lines of up to 3+ years for some operations.

yeah, you can always go to a private hospital.


LastLegionary said:
Now, people, please tell me the wonderful advantages of state run health care. And please don't tell me that "everyone" gets health care for free, because that is a disadvantage. Remember the Simpsons episode? Homer step in front of a truck because of "free health care"? Same principle.

nobody get it for free, you have to pay for it, always, as a tax in your income cheque.
 
LastLegionary said:
We still don't have a family doctor. No doctor wants new patients.
:confuse3:

You're in the city? I know of one who last I heard was taking patients, her office is at Main and Danforth. She's wonderful! PM me, I can give you her name and number. :)
 
Leslie I live in Georgetown, Halton Hills. I'm not going to respond to the rest of the replies until Arg gets back. He probably has better arguments than I do since he is more educated at this point. And I'm reasonably confident I will agree with him.
 
i do agree with a lot of what LL said on here although i agree withh gonzs statement about it beign the education is for state gov'ts but not federal. now education isnt what this is about so ill drop it now. in terms of your first question gonz, i woiuld rather pay more and get better care however i dont like the idea as LL mentioned paying for someone whos going to the doctor jsut cause they have a cold or some shit like that. however i am more sympathetic if you have an std,cancer,tuberculosis, or any other major medical problem(also with mental since it is as my prof said a part of it and is covered by insurance depending on the insurance and so on) but thats cause i feel for them and they should get the best help. same with my fam. i will admit i dont pay shit here(i live with the rents they are paying my insurance and tuition and insist on doing so but when i have a fam of ym own i will do the same. i will pay for them rather than some jerk off i dont know.)
 
LastLegionary said:
Defense is included under the purpose of government: to protect the rights of its citizens

legistlature and laws protects our rights, defence protects our government and way of life [as defined and already protected by legislation]. the people can do that for themselves, and the competition will ensure that we are efficient.
 
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

enough said?
 
under that could general welfare also include health?

the quote might cover the us, i am referring to a general scenario, not simply the states.
 
Back
Top