Jeslek said:Resorting to child porn flavio? Very noble.
flavio said:AUP section 4-7-2. Read it.
flavio said:flavio said:AUP section 4-7-2. Read it.
Fuck off.
Jeslek said:So basically you are telling the mod that removed your child porn posting to fuck off?
I'm sorry, I'm going to disagree with you there. In the case of R. vs Sharpe, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a picture like that, which you do not own, is indeed classified as child pornography and is not subject to section 2(b) of the Charter. Had they inspected my computer, they could have charged me with possession and if convicted it would make someone a childmolestor and sexual offender. I have no idea why flavio would resort to posting pictures of naked children on this message board.Leslie said:he didn't Gato, it was a cute piccy of a little boy going wee which was unfortunately taken too seriously, forcing it to be edited on a technicality.