Good medicine vs. moral ethics (A Nazi Issue)

MrBishop

Well-Known Member
Before the downfall of the Third Reich and the death of Hitler, before the victories in the fields of France and the skies over England, the Third Reich was fighting a different battle altogether...Cancer!

Hitler, a devout anti-smoker, lost his mother to breast-cancer in 1907 and began the engine that turned into the anti-cancer medical research of the 30's and 40's. Armed with the world's most sophisticated tobacco-disease epidemiology--they were the first to link smoking to lung cancer definitively--Nazi doctors were especially passionate about the hazards of tobacco

The Nazi doctors fought their war against cancer on many fronts, battling environmental and workplace hazards (restrictions on the use of asbestos) and recommending food standards (bans on carcinogenic pesticides and food dyes) and early detection ("men were advised to get their colons checked as often as they would check the engines of their cars...")

Some of their success can be attributed to hard work, and some can be attributed to human-testing. When the war was over, all medical records kept by Nazi scientists were locked up in an effort to protect the memories of the innocents that died during the research process.

Here's the issue: With the amount of research that was done locked up, and therefore useless to mankind, all the lives lost during the research died for no reason. We cannot reproduce, for humanitarian reasons, the extent of research accomplished by German scientists and doctors during those years.

Should the records be opened up so that some good can be taken from the evil that happened during the Nazi era?
 
The records should be opened.

not so good can come out of evil or anything ike that, it's just common sense
 
I think the records should be opened as well. I would think the families of the victims would be pissed to learn that they really died for nothing.
 
just give the research to the proper scientist, and don't credit the nazisa, but let teh research live on
 
What if it's imcomplete and one more person needs to die a horrible death to find the right answer?
 
paul_valaru said:
The records should be opened.

not so good can come out of evil or anything ike that, it's just common sense


Totally. I think they should be re-opened as well. If their research can help advance the research into a cure for cancer, then it's worth it.
 
Unfortunatly, they remain sealed party on the efforts of the CJA.

I can understand their reticsence. Honor for the dead, repression of all things that remind them of concentration camps etc... but the truth is that science should bypass race, religion, state and time. It doesn't...often science is controlled by money, influence and affluence. A shame really.
 
MrBishop said:
Unfortunatly, they remain sealed party on the efforts of the CJA.

I can understand their reticsence. Honor for the dead, repression of all things that remind them of concentration camps etc... but the truth is that science should bypass race, religion, state and time. It doesn't...often science is controlled by money, influence and affluence. A shame really.


as a Jew I can say I find our constant feeling sorry for ourselves, for what happened in the past gets really aggravating sometimes, this is case in point,

I would stand against an auschwitz theme park, but unseal these records.

to keep the records sealed is just another attention getting sceme by the high and might CJA, they dont' realize that the world knows we suffered, and so do things to keep it the forefront..........


uhmm, ready for your bad karma now
 
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

If the CJA is allowed to make decisions for all Jews, then the power allowed them will go to their heads (as it has in some cases), and the decisions that it makes no longer represent the masses.

tsk tsk
 
Back
Top