Cerise
Well-Known Member
The NY Times finally gets it:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/o..._r=2&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
(via bugmenot.com)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/o..._r=2&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
(via bugmenot.com)
A War We Just Might Win
By MICHAEL E. O’HANLON and KENNETH M. POLLACK
Here is the most important thing Americans need to understand: We are finally getting somewhere in Iraq, at least in military terms. As two analysts who have harshly criticized the Bush administration’s miserable handling of Iraq, we were surprised by the gains we saw and the potential to produce not necessarily “victory” but a sustainable stability that both we and the Iraqis could live with.
Today, morale is high. The soldiers and marines told us they feel that they now have a superb commander in Gen. David Petraeus; they are confident in his strategy, they see real results, and they feel now they have the numbers needed to make a real difference.
Everywhere, Army and Marine units were focused on securing the Iraqi population, working with Iraqi security units, creating new political and economic arrangements at the local level and providing basic services — electricity, fuel, clean water and sanitation — to the people. Yet in each place, operations had been appropriately tailored to the specific needs of the community. As a result, civilian fatality rates are down roughly a third since the surge began — though they remain very high, underscoring how much more still needs to be done.